| [2022] FWCA 203 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
(AG2022/98)
AUSTRAL SF GROUP PTY LTD / CFMEU COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2019-2023
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| COMMISSIONER JOHNS | SYDNEY, 25 JANUARY 2022 |
Application for approval of the Austral SF Group Pty Ltd / CFMEU Collective Agreement 2019-2023
An application has been made for approval of a greenfields agreement known as the Austral SF Group Pty Ltd / CFMEU Collective Agreement 2019-2023 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a greenfields agreement. It has been made by the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union.
I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. In particular, I am satisfied that the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
Pursuant to s.53(2)(b) of the Act I note the Agreement was made with the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union and that the Agreement covers this organisation.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54(1) of the Act, will operate from 1 February 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2023.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE514705 PR737751>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2022] FWCA 203
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 203
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009, including its provisions on good faith bargaining, and whether the agreement was in the best interests of the employees. The Commission had to consider the terms and conditions of the agreement, the process by which it was negotiated, and whether there were any provisions that were unfair or detrimental to the employees. The Commission also had to consider whether the agreement was consistent with the objectives of the Act, including promoting high levels of employment and the achievement of productive, fair and flexible workplace relations.
In its decision, the Commission found that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees and should be approved. The Commission noted that the agreement had been negotiated in good faith and that the parties had made significant efforts to reach a consensus. The Commission also found that the agreement contained provisions that were beneficial to the employees, such as provisions on wages and conditions, and that there were no provisions that were unfair or detrimental to the employees. The Commission concluded that the agreement was consistent with the objectives of the Act and that it should be approved. The Commission made orders approving the agreement and setting out the terms and conditions that would apply to employees covered by the agreement for the specified period.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.