| [2025] FWC 2237 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union
v
Dow Performance Materials (Australia) Pty Ltd
(B2025/1216)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 31 JULY 2025 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Dow Performance Materials (Australia) Pty Ltd.
This is an application by the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (CFMEU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Dow Performance Materials (Australia) Pty Ltd (Dow Performance or Employer).
On 31 July 2025, the Commission was advised that the Employer did not object to the Application, noting an amendment had been sought by the CFMEU to clarify the group of employees to be balloted.
In the circumstances, I have decided to grant leave to amend the application and determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Emma Barnes-Whelan, Lawyer, setting out the steps taken by the CFMEU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Dow Performance, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC).
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 11 September 2025.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
An Order has been separately issued in PR790231.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] This is, in effect, 30 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR790232>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union v Dow Performance Materials (Australia) Pty Ltd [2025] FWC 2237
- Case
- [2025] FWC 2237
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission involved whether the CFMEU had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with Dow Performance and if all requirements under section 443(1) of the Act were satisfied. The Commission considered the declaration of Emma Barnes-Whelan, a lawyer for the CFMEU, which outlined the steps taken in bargaining with Dow Performance. The Commission found that the CFMEU had been genuinely attempting to reach an agreement, and all the requirements under section 443(1) were met, including the notification time for the proposed agreement.
The Commission granted the application and determined that the Australian Electoral Commission would conduct the ballot. The voting period would close on 11 September 2025, effectively 30 working days from the making of the order. This date also established the ballot period for the purpose of section 448A(2) of the Act. Additionally, the matter was assigned to another member of the Commission to conduct a compulsory conciliation conference. Directions were likely to be issued to ensure that the parties attended the conference prepared for meaningful negotiations.
The Commission issued an order granting the application and set the date for the closing of the voting period. The matter was to be referred to another member of the Commission for a compulsory conciliation conference, and Directions would be issued to ensure the parties were ready for meaningful negotiations.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.