| [2024] FWC 3185 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union
v
Cape Preston Port Company Pty Ltd
(B2024/1482)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT CLANCY | MELBOURNE, 19 NOVEMBER 2024 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Cape Preston Port Company Pty Ltd
This is an application by the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (CFMEU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Cape Preston Port Company Pty Ltd (CPPC or Employer).
On 18 November 2024, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application subject to confirmation of there being an extended notice period of four (4) calendar days, but no less than three (3) working days in relation to the proposed forms of industrial action. The CFMEU, in effect, accepted that there were relevant exceptional circumstances and agreed to that amendment.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of George Gakis, Union Official, setting out the steps taken by the CFMEU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with CPPC, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 12 December 2024.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
An Order has been separately issued in PR781378.
Pursuant to section 443(5) of the Act, I am satisfied that there are relevant exceptional circumstances justifying the period of written notice referred to in section 414(2)(b) of the Act being longer than three (3) working days. By consent, the Commission has specified 4 calendar days but not less than 3 working days as the minimum period of written notice required in respect of the industrial action taken by employees arising from the ballot questions in clause 5 of the Order.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] This is, in effect, 21 calendar days from the anticipated commencement date of the ballot and was the period sought in the application.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR781380>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union v Cape Preston Port Company Pty Ltd [2024] FWC 3185
- Case
- [2024] FWC 3185
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were whether the requirements for a protected action ballot under section 437 of the Fair Work Act were satisfied and if there were exceptional circumstances justifying an extended notice period for the proposed industrial action. The CFMEU argued that the requirements had been met, and exceptional circumstances justified an extended notice period. CPPC did not oppose the application, subject to the conditions mentioned. The Deputy President found that the requirements for the ballot were indeed met and that exceptional circumstances justified the extended notice period.
The Deputy President determined that the CFMEU had followed the necessary steps in bargaining with CPPC and had been genuinely trying to reach an agreement. The Commission was satisfied that the notification time for the proposed agreement was appropriate, and all requirements under section 443(1) of the Act had been met. Given the consent of the parties, the Commission specified a four-calendar-day notice period, but no less than three working days, as the minimum period of written notice required for the industrial action arising from the ballot questions. The ballot was to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS), an approved ballot agent under the Act.
The final orders issued by the Deputy President confirmed the ballot period ending on 12 December 2024 and mandated a compulsory conciliation conference under section 448A of the Act. The conference would require the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement. Directions would also be issued to ensure the parties were prepared to conduct meaningful negotiations at the conference.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.