| [2025] FWC 840 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union
v
BMS Heavy Cranes Australia Pty Ltd
(B2025/505)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 26 MARCH 2025 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of BMS Heavy Cranes Australia Pty Ltd
This is an application by the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (CFMEU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of BMS Heavy Cranes Australia Pty Ltd (BMS or Employer).
On 26 March 2025, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application. I observe that BMS did clarify certain aspects of the negotiations which do not impact upon compliance with the statutory requirements to make the proposed order.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Emma Barnes-Whelan, Lawyer, setting out the steps taken by the CFMEU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with BMS, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by the Australian Electoral Commission.
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 12 May 2025.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
An Order has been separately issued in PR785556.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1]This is, in effect, 30 working days from the making of the Order, which is the minimum period required by the AEC.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR785557>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union v BMS Heavy Cranes Australia Pty Ltd [2025] FWC 840
- Case
- [2025] FWC 840
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court involved verifying whether the statutory requirements for a protected action ballot order had been met under section 443(1) of the Fair Work Act. The court needed to determine if there was a notification period in relation to the proposed agreement and if all conditions were satisfied for the order to be made. The application was assessed based on the declaration by the union's lawyer and the employer's lack of objection. The court was also required to set a closing date for the voting period, ensuring it aligned with the minimum period required by the Australian Electoral Commission.
Deputy President Hampton determined that all statutory requirements for the ballot order were met, as evidenced by the union's declaration and the employer's non-objection. The court ordered that the ballot be conducted by the Australian Electoral Commission and set the voting closure date for 12 May 2025, which was 30 working days from the order's issuance. This date also established the ballot period for the purpose of section 448A(2) of the Act. The matter was assigned to another member of the Commission for a compulsory conciliation conference to ensure meaningful negotiations between the parties.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.