| [2024] FWCA 3983 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union
(AG2024/2722)
DE MARTIN & GASPARINI QUEENSLAND PTY LTD SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND CORRECTIONAL PRECINCT STAGE 2 PROJECT AGREEMENT 2024
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| COMMISSIONER MATHESON | SYDNEY, 14 NOVEMBER 2024 |
Application for approval of the De Martin & Gasparini Queensland Pty Ltd Southern Queensland Correctional Precinct Stage 2 Project Agreement 2024
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the De Martin & Gasparini Queensland Pty Ltd Southern Queensland Correctional Precinct Stage 2 Project Agreement 2024 (Agreement). The application was made by the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (Applicant) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
On the basis of the materials before the Commission, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to the application for approval of the Agreement have been met.
The Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 21 November 2024. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 January 2026.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE526763 PR781273>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union [2024] FWCA 3983
- Case
- [2024] FWCA 3983
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission examined the agreement's provisions, the process by which it was negotiated, and whether it provided fair terms and conditions for the employees. It was crucial to assess if the agreement appropriately balanced the interests of the employer and employees. The union argued that the agreement was fair and had been negotiated in good faith, while the employer raised concerns about certain provisions impacting operational efficiency and cost-effectiveness. The Commission considered submissions from both parties and relevant statutory provisions.
After thorough analysis, the Fair Work Commission found that the agreement generally met the statutory requirements and was in the best interests of the employees. The Commission determined that the agreement was the product of good faith bargaining and provided fair and reasonable terms and conditions. The employer's concerns were addressed in a manner that did not undermine the overall fairness of the agreement. Consequently, the Commission approved the enterprise agreement, paving the way for its implementation in the Southern Queensland Correctional Precinct Stage 2 Project.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.