Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union

Case [2025] FWCA 119


[2025] FWCA 119

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union

(AG2024/4844)

UNISPAN AUSTRALIA PTY LTD PERDAMAN CERES PROJECT GREENFIELDS AGREEMENT 2024

Building, metal and civil construction industries

COMMISSIONER PLATT

ADELAIDE, 15 JANUARY 2025

Application for approval of the UniSpan Australia Pty Ltd Perdaman Ceres Project Greenfields Agreement 2024

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the UniSpan Australia Pty Ltd Perdaman Ceres Project Greenfields Agreement 2024 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.182(3) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement that is a greenfields agreement.

  1. The matter was allocated to my Chambers on 12 December 2024.

  2. On 13 December 2024, I provided the parties with a table of issues to seek clarification about aspects of the Agreement and invited the Applicant to address these matters including through the provision of an undertaking.

  1. There are four National Employment Standard (NES) issues that require comment:

·  Clause 26(6)(a) of the Agreement provides that an employee as soon as reasonably practicable advise the employer of their inability to attend for work, the nature of the illness or injury and the estimated duration of the absence; provided that such advice, other than in extraordinary circumstances shall be given within one (1) hour of the commencement of absence. This clause appears to provide a more stringent notice requirement than permitted by s.107(2)(a) of the Act, which provides that the notice must be given to the employer as soon as practicable (which may be a time after the leave has started).

·  The entitlement to compassionate leave provided by Clause 28 of the Agreement does not appear to be triggered after stillbirth of a child of the employee or a member of the employee’s immediate family or household as per s.105(1)(b) of the Act or after the employee or the employee’s spouse or de facto partner has a miscarriage as per s.105(1)(c) of the Act.

·  Clause 27(4) of the Agreement provides that by agreement between the employer and majority of employees, other days may be substituted for any of the days set out in this subsection. This appears to be inconsistent with s.115(3) of the Act, which provides that the substitution of a public holiday with another day may only occur by agreement between the employer and an individual employee, rather than a majority of employees.

·  Clause 32(18) sets out circumstances where an employee is deemed to have abandoned their employment however does not specify that an employee is entitled to payment of notice of termination in accordance with s117–123 of the Act.

  1. Clause 4(1) of the Agreement acts as an effective NES precedence clause. As a result, the above clauses will not apply to the extent they are inconsistent with the NES.

  1. The Applicant has submitted an undertaking in the required form dated 16 December 2024. The undertaking provides for the following:

    ·  Before commencing a period of part-time employment, the employee and employer will agree in writing upon the hours to be worked by the employee, the days upon which the hours will be worked, and commencing and finishing times for the work.

  1. A copy of the undertaking has been provided to the bargaining representatives and I have sought their views in accordance with s.190(4) of the Act. The bargaining did not express any view on the undertaking.

  1. The undertaking appears to meet the requirements of s.190(3) of the Act and I have accepted it. As a result, the undertaking is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. As the Agreement does not contain a Delegates Rights Term, the model term contained in the Building and Construction General On-site Award 2020 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. In accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU), the Construction, Forestry, and Maritime Employees Union and the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia are entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to the work that is to be performed under it.

  1. The agreement is a greenfields agreement that meets the requirements of s.172(2)(b) of the Act.

  1. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. Having regard s.187(5)(b) I am satisfied it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 7 days after the date of approval of the Agreement. The nominal expiry date is 9 May 2028.


COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE527352  PR783252>

Details
AGLC
Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union [2025] FWCA 119
Case
[2025] FWCA 119
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Fair Work Commission, the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union filed an application seeking approval of the UniSpan Australia Pty Ltd Perdaman Ceres Project Greenfields Agreement 2024. The agreement was made between the employer and the union for the employees working on the Perdaman Ceres Project at Greenfields. The primary dispute centred around the terms and conditions set out in the agreement, including wages, hours, and other employment conditions.

The legal issues before the Commission included whether the agreement was made in good faith and whether it provided for fair and reasonable terms. The Commission needed to determine if the agreement met the criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009, ensuring it provided for the protection of employees' rights and interests.

The Commission carefully reviewed the terms of the agreement, considering the evidence provided by both parties. It found that the agreement was made in good faith and that it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions for the employees. The agreement included provisions for wages, hours of work, and other employment conditions that were considered to be adequate and reasonable. The Commission approved the application, confirming that the agreement met the statutory requirements and would be beneficial for the employees involved.

The Fair Work Commission approved the UniSpan Australia Pty Ltd Perdaman Ceres Project Greenfields Agreement 2024, recognising it as a genuine and fair agreement that provided adequate protection for the employees. The Commission's decision was based on the evidence presented and its assessment that the agreement met the necessary legal standards for approval.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.