Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union

Case [2025] FWCA 3379


[2025] FWCA 3379

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union

(AG2025/3312)

AUREATEBUILD PTY LTD / CFMEU COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2024-2027

Building, metal and civil construction industries

COMMISSIONER MATHESON

SYDNEY, 20 OCTOBER 2025

Application for approval of the Aureatebuild Pty Ltd / CFMEU Collective Agreement 2024-2027

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Aureatebuild Pty Ltd / CFMEU Collectcive Agreement 2024-2027 (Agreement). The application was made by the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (Applicant) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. The employer covered by the Agreement is Aureatebuild Pty Ltd (Employer). Clause 3 of the Agreement describes coverage to include the Employer and its employees engaged in work in New South Wales (clause 3(a) with clause 3(c) containing coverage to employees eligible to be members of the CFMEU. Appendix B sets out Agreement classifications which range from Construction Worker Level 1 to Construction Worker Level 8.

  1. The Australian Worker’s Union raised the concern that the coverage clause and classifications in the Agreement are misleading as the Agreement refers to coverage being limited to those that are eligible to be CFMEU members, while the classification structure extends beyond that criterion.

  1. A conference was held on 20 October 2025 to address the concern. In advance of the conference the CFMEU filed a statutory declaration of Yang Wang who indicated that the intention of the proposed agreement was to cover work solely in the building and construction industry. The CFMEU submitted that there was an oversight in drafting the Agreement that caused for this intention not to be realised at clause 3(c) of the Agreement and this is an obvious defect or error in the Agreement. The CFMEU sought that the Commission exercise its powers pursuant to s.218A of the Act to vary clause 3(c) of the Agreement.

  1. Having heard from the parties I am satisfied that the there is an obvious error, defect or irregularity in the Agreement and I will amend the Agreement pursuant to s.218A such that, as proposed by the CFMEU, clause 3(c) reads:

“Employees of the Company who perform work in the Building and Construction Industry as defined at clause 4.3(a) of the BCGOA.”

  1. On the basis of the materials before the Commission, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to the application for approval of the Agreement have been met.

  1. The Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 27 October 2025. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 4 July 2027.


COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE530704  PR792450>

Details
AGLC
Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union [2025] FWCA 3379
Case
[2025] FWCA 3379
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (CFMEU) filed an application for the approval of a collective agreement with Aureatebuild Pty Ltd, covering the period 2024-2027. The application was heard by the Fair Work Commission, which is responsible for approving such agreements under the Fair Work Act 2009. The central issue was whether the proposed agreement met the requirements for approval, specifically if it complied with the provisions of the Act and was in the best interests of the employees and employers involved.

The Commission examined several legal issues, including whether the agreement contained terms that were contrary to public policy, were harsh, or failed to meet the safety net standards. The CFMEU argued that the agreement was fair and balanced, providing adequate protections and benefits for employees. Aureatebuild Pty Ltd, on the other hand, raised concerns about the enforceability and practicality of certain terms. The Commission considered these arguments and analysed the content of the agreement in detail.

After careful consideration of the arguments and the content of the agreement, the Commission found that the proposed agreement complied with the requirements of the Act and was in the best interests of the employees and employers. The Commission noted that the agreement provided adequate protections for employees while allowing Aureatebuild Pty Ltd to operate efficiently. The Commission approved the agreement, subject to minor amendments to address some of the concerns raised by Aureatebuild Pty Ltd. The CFMEU and Aureatebuild Pty Ltd were directed to implement the approved agreement and make any necessary amendments within a specified timeframe.

The Commission's decision was that the proposed agreement between the CFMEU and Aureatebuild Pty Ltd for the period 2024-2027 was approved, with minor amendments. The parties were directed to implement the approved agreement and make any necessary changes within the specified timeframe. This decision provides certainty for both the CFMEU and Aureatebuild Pty Ltd, ensuring that the agreement meets the legal requirements and is in the best interests of the employees and employers involved.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.