| [2024] FWCA 1367 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union
(AG2024/1149)
BSECC PTY LTD AND THE CFMEU (VICTORIAN CONSTRUCTION AND GENERAL DIVISION) SUBCONTRACTORS EARTHMOVING, EXCAVATION AND DRAINAGE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2020-2023
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 19 APRIL 2024 |
Application for approval of the BSECC PTY LTD and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Subcontractors Earthmoving, Excavation and Drainage Enterprise Agreement 2020-2023
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the BSECC PTY LTD and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Subcontractors Earthmoving, Excavation and Drainage Enterprise Agreement 2020-2023 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
The Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 26 April 2024. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 April 2024.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE524245 PR773603>
- AGLC
- Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union [2024] FWCA 1367
- Case
- [2024] FWCA 1367
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered various aspects of the agreement, including its compliance with the Fair Work Act, the process by which it was made, and whether it provided for the appropriate minimum entitlements. The Union argued that the agreement was fairly and genuinely negotiated and included provisions that were necessary for the industry. The company, BSECC PTY LTD, did not contest the agreement but submitted that certain sections required clarification to ensure they did not contravene minimum standards. The court found that the agreement was made in good faith and without coercion, and it complied with the minimum entitlements as stipulated in the Act. The court approved the agreement with minor modifications to ensure clarity and adherence to statutory standards.
The court's decision was based on the evidence provided by both parties and the requirements under the Fair Work Act. The Union's negotiation process was deemed appropriate, and the agreement was found to be in the best interests of the employees. The court emphasised the importance of ensuring that agreements provide for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment. The final orders included the approval of the enterprise agreement with the specified modifications to ensure compliance and clarity.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.