Conquest Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd

Case

[2019] FWCA 8225

4 DECEMBER 2019

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2019] FWCA 8225
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Conquest Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd
(AG2019/4536)

CONQUEST CONSTRUCTIONS (NSW) PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2019 - 2023

Building, metal and civil construction industries

COMMISSIONER CIRKOVIC

MELBOURNE, 4 DECEMBER 2019

Application for approval of the Conquest Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2019 - 2023.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Conquest Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2019 - 2023 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Conquest Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.

[3] Noting clause 3.4.5(b) of the Agreement, I am satisfied that the more beneficial entitlements of the National Employment Standards in the Act (NES) will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

[4] The application was not lodged within 14 days after the agreement was made. Pursuant to s.185(3)(b), in all the circumstances I consider it fair to extend the time for making the application to the date it was actually made.

[5] The Agreement was approved on 4 December 2019 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 11 December 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 3 December 2023.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE506344  PR714858>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0