Legal Research
Cases
Confiscations Act 1997 Applications (Ruling No. 3 – Costs)

Confiscations Act 1997 Applications (Ruling No. 3 – Costs)

Case [2021] VCC 2068

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Confiscations Act 1997 Applications (Ruling No. 3 – Costs) [2021] VCC 2068
Case: [2021] VCC 2068
Decision Date: 16 December 2021

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Confiscations Act 1997 Applications (Ruling No. 3 – Costs) [2021] VCC 2068

Cases Citing This Decision

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Bow Ye Investments Pty Ltd (in Liq) v Director of Public Prosecutions (No 2) [2009] VSCA 278
Citation 1

…DPP v Le (No 2) [2007] VSCA 57; DPP v Ali (No 2) [2009] VSCA 242; Bow Ye Investments Pty Ltd (in Liq) v DPP (No 2) [2009] VSCA 278 9Such an approach was adopted more recently in Trajkovski v DPP[4] where an unsuccessful applicant for an exclusion order was ordered to pay the Director’s costs on the basis that the…
Sabo v George Weston Foods [2009] VSCA 242
Citation 2

…ne which does not exclude the general power to award costs.[3] [3] DPP v Le (No 2) [2007] VSCA 57; DPP v Ali (No 2) [2009] VSCA 242; Bow Ye Investments Pty Ltd (in Liq) v DPP (No 2) [2009] VSCA 278 9Such an approach was adopted more recently in Trajkovski v DPP[4] where an unsuccessful applicant for an exclusion o…
DPP v Le (No 2) [2007] VSCA 57
Citation 3

…y power to award costs as being one which does not exclude the general power to award costs.[3] [3] DPP v Le (No 2) [2007] VSCA 57; DPP v Ali (No 2) [2009] VSCA 242; Bow Ye Investments Pty Ltd (in Liq) v DPP (No 2) [2009] VSCA 278 9Such an approach was adopted more recently in Trajkovski v DPP[4] where an unsucce…
Dale v Clayton Utz (No 3) [2013] VSC 593
Citation 4

…d to have acted with “competence and diligence” triggering the increased costs incurred by the successful party. [2][2013] VSC 593 8The Act provides for costs to be awarded in circumstances set out in s 133A. That section makes specific provision for costs to be awarded in circumstances described in sections 133A…
Trajkovski v Director of Public Prosecutions [2012] VSC 121
Citation 5

…pay the Director’s costs on the basis that the usual rule as to costs in civil proceedings was to be applied. [4][2012] VSC 121 10In Bow Ye it was stated: “The combined effect of the restriction created by s 133A(1), with the preconditions detailed in s 133A(2) and (3) is that the section ensures that persons ch…

AI Chat coming soon