Conciliation and Arbitration Regulations (Amendment) (Cth)
STATUTORY RULES
REGULATIONS UNDER THE CONCILIATION AND ARBITRATION ACT 1904-1970.*
I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth
of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby
make the following Regulations under the
Dated this twenty-fourth day
of January, 1972
Paul Hasluck
Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
Sgd. Ivor J. Greenwood
Attorney-General.
Amendments of the Conciliation and Arbitration Regulations
“Division 3b.—Proceedings under the Trade Practices Act (Regulations 78j-78p).”
and inserting in their stead the words—
“Division 3b.—Proceedings under the Restrictive Trade Practices Act (Regulations 78j-78pa).”
“
. |
“78j. In this Division—
‘question of law’ means a question of law arising in proceedings before the Tribunal that is referred to the Court under section 65 of the Restrictive Trade Practices Act;
‘the Restrictive Trade Practices Act’ means the
Restrictive Practices
Act 1971;‘the Tribunal’ means the Trade Practices Tribunal.
“78k.—(1.) The reference to the Court of a question of law shall be in writing signed on behalf of the Tribunal by the presidential member presiding at the hearing of the proceedings in which it has arisen and shall set out—
(
a ) a statement that the question is referred to the Court by the Tribunal of its own motion, or on the application of a specified party to the proceedings, as the case may be;
* Notified in the
StatutoryRules 1956, No. 60. as amended by Statutory Rules 1957, No. 78: 1958, Nos. 7 and 53; 1959, No. 19; 1960, No. 86; 1961, No. 123; 1963, No. 14; and 1967, Nos. 35 and 136; by Act No. 53 of 1970; and by Statutory Rules 1970, No. 162; and 1971, Nos. 95 and 115.
23952/71—Price 8c 10/22.12.1971
(
b ) a precise statement of the question of law;(
c ) full particulars of the matter in relation to which the question has arisen;(
d ) any findings of fact that the Tribunal has made that appear to be relevant to the question;(
e ) a short statement of any contentions of the parties in relation to the question;(
f ) if relevant to the question, the terms of any determination or order proposed to be made by the Tribunal; and(
g ) the names and addresses of the parties to the proceedings before the Tribunal,
“(2.) Where—
(
a ) a question of law is referred to the Court; and(
b ) an order has been made under the Restrictive Trade Practices Regulations directing that persons having a common interest in the proceedings in which the question of law has arisen be represented in those proceedings by a person specified in the order,
it is sufficient compliance with paragraph (
“(3.) Where a question of law arises in proceedings before the Tribunal in relation to which a person has an address for service, the address to be set out in respect of that person in the reference of the question is that address.
“(4.) The reference shall be lodged with the Registrar by the party who instituted the proceedings in the Tribunal in which the question arose.
“(5.) When a reference has been lodged with the Registrar in pursuance of the last preceding sub-regulation, the Chief Judge, or the next senior judge who is available, shall fix a time and place for the hearing of the question of law and the Registrar shall send, in accordance with any directions of the Chief Judge or other Judge, to each of the persons that the Chief Judge or other Judge specifies, notice of the time and place so fixed, together with a copy of the reference,
“78L. In relation to a prosecution for an offence against the Restrictive Trade Practices Act, information, warrant or other process or a conviction shall suffice if the offence is set out, as nearly as may be, in the words of that Act.
“78m. Proceedings under section 99 or section 135 of the Restrictive Trade Practices Act shall, so far as is practicable, be instituted and conducted in like manner as actions for damages in the High Court are instituted and conducted.
“78n.—(1.) Subject to the next succeeding regulation, an
application for an injunction under section 102, 120 or 125 of the
Restrictive Trade Practices Act may be made to the Court or a Judge
“(2.) Upon such an application, the Court or Judge may make an order calling on the proposed respondent to show cause why an injunction should not be granted, being an order—
(
a ) in the case of an application under section 102—in accordance with Form 23b; or(
b ) in the case of an application under section 120 or 125—in accordance with Form 23a.
“(3.) As soon as practicable after an order in accordance with the last preceding sub-regulation is made, the applicant shall file the order and the supporting affidavit with the Registrar.
“(4.) An order under sub-regulation (2.) of this regulation, together with a copy of the affidavit referred to in sub-regulation (1.) of this regulation, shall be served by the applicant on the respondent at least two clear days before the day fixed for the hearing of the application, unless the Court or Judge gives
leave for shorter service.
“(5.) At the hearing of the application, unless the Court or Judge otherwise permits—
(
a ) any evidence shall be by affidavit; and(
b ) the evidence in support of the application shall consist solely of the evidence set out in the affidavit referred to in sub-regulation (1.) of this regulation.
“(6.) Where the Court or Judge hearing an application permits further evidence to be given in support of the application, the permission may be given subject to such conditions, including conditions as to costs, as the Court or Judge thinks fit.
“78p.—(1) An application for an injunction under section 102 of the Restrictive Trade Practices Act may be included as a claim in a writ instituting an action under section 99 of that Act for damages.
“(2.) Proceedings in an action referred to in the last preceding sub-regulation shall, as far as is practicable, be conducted in like manner as proceedings in the High Court claiming both damages and an injunction are conducted.
“78pa.—(I.) In this regulation—
‘the Clerk’ means the Clerk of Shipping Agreements holding office under Part XII. of the Restrictive Trade Practices Act;
‘the Commissioner’ means the Commissioner of Trade Practices and includes a person appointed to act as the Commissioner of Trade Practices.
“(2.) In any proceedings in the Court, a certificate under the hand of the Clerk certifying that a specified fact in relation to the lodgment or receipt or non-lodgment or non-receipt of a document, or of a document of a specified description, appears from records kept in the office of the Clerk is evidence of that fact.
“(3.) In any proceedings in the Court, a certificate under the hand of the Commissioner certifying that a specified fact in relation to the lodgment or receipt or non-lodgment or non-receipt of a document, or of a document of a specified description, appears from records kept in the offices of the Commissioner is evidence of that fact.”
“(1a.) The fees to be demanded and paid in respect of proceedings under section 99 or section 135 of the
Form 23a. Regulation 78n
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE.
In the Commonwealth Industrial Court.
In the matter of the
Between Applicant
and
Respondent.
It is hereby
ordered that the abovenamed respondent appear before the Commonwealth
Industrial Court at in the State of on
the day of ,
19 ,
at o’clock in the noon on the
hearing of an application by the abovenamed applicant for an injunction under
section 120 (
sworn the
day of , 19 and filed herein.
By the Court,
Judge.
————
Form 23b. Regulation 78n.
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE.
In the Commonwealth Industrial court.
In
the matter of the
Between
Applicant
and
Respondent.
It
is hereby ordered that the abovenamed respondent appear before the Commonwealth
Industrial Court at in
the State of on
the day of ,19 , at o’clock
in the noon on the hearing
of an application by the abovenamed applicant for an injunction under section
102 of the
sworn the
day of , 19 , and filed herein.
THE SCHEDULE
Dated this day of , 19 .
By the Court.
Judge.
————
Printed by Authority by the Government Printer of the Commonwealth of Australia
0
0
0