Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Conca D'Oro Lounge Pty Ltd v Leichhardt Municipal Council [2016] NSWLEC 1029 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 7 September 2015 Date of orders: 29 January 2016 Decision date: 29 January 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dixon C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: APPEAL – order for cease of use of premises as café outdoor area: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Conca D'Oro Lounge Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Leichhardt Municipal Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Mr Gordon Hartley (Applicant)
Mr Mark Bonanno (Respondent)
Hartley Solicitors (Applicant)
Leichhardt Municipal Council (Respondent)
File Number(s): 10158 of 2015
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement were made on the date recorded on those orders. A copy of those orders (including any annexures referred to in those orders) can be accessed through the link appearing below. The date of the orders appears on the first page of the orders.
…………….
Susan Dixon
Commissioner
10158 of 2015 - Order (6.86 KB, pdf)
10158 of 2015 - Annexure A (72.4 KB, pdf)
10158 of 2015 - Annexure A - Parking Assessment (710 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Conca D'Oro Lounge Pty Ltd v Leichhardt Municipal Council [2016] NSWLEC 1029
- Case
- [2016] NSWLEC 1029
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was whether the Council's decision was legally sound and in accordance with the relevant legislative and regulatory framework. Specifically, the court needed to determine whether the Council's decision was unreasonable in the Wednesbury sense, whether there was a failure to take into account relevant considerations, or whether there was an error of law on the face of the record.
The court found that the Council's decision was not unreasonable, as it was based on substantial evidence and did not fail to take into account relevant considerations. The Council had provided detailed reasons for its decision, which were supported by the evidence before it. The court further held that there was no error of law on the face of the record. The court dismissed the plaintiff's application for judicial review, affirming the Council's decision to refuse the liquor licence. The court did not order any costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.