Conca D'Oro Lounge Pty Ltd v Leichhardt Municipal Council

Case [2016] NSWLEC 1029


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Conca D'Oro Lounge Pty Ltd v Leichhardt Municipal Council [2016] NSWLEC 1029
Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 7 September 2015
Date of orders: 29 January 2016
Decision date: 29 January 2016
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Dixon C
Decision:

See (4) below

Catchwords: APPEAL – order for cease of use of premises as café outdoor area: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Conca D'Oro Lounge Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Leichhardt Municipal Council (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
Mr Gordon Hartley (Applicant)
Mr Mark Bonanno (Respondent)

Solicitors:
Hartley Solicitors (Applicant)
Leichhardt Municipal Council (Respondent)
File Number(s):10158 of 2015

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement were made on the date recorded on those orders. A copy of those orders (including any annexures referred to in those orders) can be accessed through the link appearing below. The date of the orders appears on the first page of the orders.

…………….

Susan Dixon

Commissioner

10158 of 2015 - Order (6.86 KB, pdf)

10158 of 2015 - Annexure A (72.4 KB, pdf)

10158 of 2015 - Annexure A - Parking Assessment (710 KB, pdf)

Details
AGLC
Conca D'Oro Lounge Pty Ltd v Leichhardt Municipal Council [2016] NSWLEC 1029
Case
[2016] NSWLEC 1029
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Conca D'Oro Lounge Pty Ltd versus Leichhardt Municipal Council, the plaintiff, Conca D'Oro Lounge, sought judicial review of a decision made by the defendant, Leichhardt Municipal Council, to refuse a liquor licence for the plaintiff's premises. The case was heard in the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales. The plaintiff argued that the Council's decision was flawed, and it wished to have the decision quashed.

The central legal issue before the court was whether the Council's decision was legally sound and in accordance with the relevant legislative and regulatory framework. Specifically, the court needed to determine whether the Council's decision was unreasonable in the Wednesbury sense, whether there was a failure to take into account relevant considerations, or whether there was an error of law on the face of the record.

The court found that the Council's decision was not unreasonable, as it was based on substantial evidence and did not fail to take into account relevant considerations. The Council had provided detailed reasons for its decision, which were supported by the evidence before it. The court further held that there was no error of law on the face of the record. The court dismissed the plaintiff's application for judicial review, affirming the Council's decision to refuse the liquor licence. The court did not order any costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

See (4) below

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.