| [2022] FWCA 3129 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Complex Electrical (CE Group) Pty Ltd T/A Complex Electrical (CEA Group)
(AG2022/3515)
Complex Electrical (CE Group) Pty Ltd & ETU NSW Construction Enterprise Agreement 2022
| Electrical contracting industry | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT MILLHOUSE | MELBOURNE, 9 SEPTEMBER 2022 |
Application for approval of the Complex Electrical (CE Group) Pty Ltd & ETU NSW Construction Enterprise Agreement 2022
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Complex Electrical (CE Group) Pty Ltd & ETU NSW Construction Enterprise Agreement 2022 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act). It has been made by Complex Electrical (CE Group) Pty Ltd T/A Complex Electrical (CE Group) (Employer). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
The Notice of Employee Representational Rights (NERR) issued by the Employer on 21 July 2022 was not in the form prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 (Cth). Rather, the NERR included the Employer’s logo and contact details. Having regard to the material before the Commission I am satisfied that:
(a) the error identified at [2] constitutes a minor procedural or technical error for the purposes of s 188(2)(a); and
(b) the employees to be covered by the Agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by the error.[1]
The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.
Subject to the undertakings, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
Pursuant to s 202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
The Commission raised with the Employer that clauses 38(b) and 42(c) of the Agreement may be inconsistent with National Employment Standards (NES). Clause 38(b) provides that an Employee agrees to reimburse the Employer for overpayments which may be deducted from money payable on termination. Clause 42(c) provides that an Employee authorises the Employer to deduct from any wages or entitlements payable or owing to the Employees any personal costs incurred by the Employee on a company mobile telephone. However, noting clause 9(b) of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s 183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s 201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s 54 of the Act, will operate from 16 September 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 October 2023.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Annexure A
[1] Huntsman Chemical Company Australia Pty Limited t/a RMAX Rigid Cellular Plastics and Others [2019] FWCFB 318
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE517365 PR745652>
- AGLC
- Complex Electrical (CE Group) Pty Ltd T/A Complex Electrical (CEA Group) [2022] FWCA 3129
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 3129
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the agreement to determine if it contained all the minimum entitlements set out in the relevant award. The court also considered if the agreement was fairly negotiated and reached in good faith, as required by the Fair Work Act. It was crucial to ensure that the agreement was not only compliant with statutory minimum standards but also reflected a genuine negotiation process between the employer and the union. The court scrutinised the process of negotiation, the content of the agreement, and the compliance with procedural fairness and good faith principles.
After careful consideration, the court found that the agreement met the necessary statutory requirements. The agreement was found to include all the minimum entitlements prescribed by the relevant award and was the product of genuine negotiation and good faith efforts by both parties. The court was satisfied that the process followed was procedurally fair and that the agreement was appropriately negotiated. Consequently, the court approved the agreement, confirming its validity and enforceability under the Fair Work Act.
The final orders of the court were that the Complex Electrical (CE Group) Pty Ltd & ETU NSW Construction Enterprise Agreement 2022 be approved as meeting the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009. This approval allows the agreement to be registered and enforced as a legally binding enterprise agreement between the parties.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.