Compass Group B&I Hospitality Services Pty Ltd

Case [2015] FWCA 5790


[2015] FWCA 5790
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s 185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Compass Group B&I Hospitality Services Pty Ltd
(AG2015/4273)

COMPASS GROUP (PORT PHILLIP PRISON) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015

Hospitality industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT SAMS

SYDNEY, 24 AUGUST 2015

Application for approval of the Compass Group (Port Phillip Prison) Enterprise Agreement 2015.

[1] This is an application, pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the ‘Act’), filed by Compass Group B&I Hospitality Services Pty Ltd (the ‘applicant’) which seeks the approval of the Fair Work Commission (the ‘Commission’) of a single enterprise agreement to be known as the Compass Group (Port Phillip Prison) Enterprise Agreement 2015 (the ‘Agreement’). The Agreement was negotiated with United Voice (the ‘Union’) and is to cover 14 employees, other than the Site Manager, employed by the applicant in relation to the applicant’s hospitality operations at Port Phillip Prison, Laverton North, Victoria in satisfaction of a contract between the applicant and the operator of the prison, G4S. For the purposes of s 186(3) of the Act, I am satisfied that the group of employees to be covered by this Agreement has been fairly chosen.

[2] The employees were last notified of their representational rights on 3 March 2015, and voting for the Agreement’s approval took place on 27 and 28 July 2015. The time limits under s 181(2) of the Act are thereby satisfied. In a secret ballot, all 13 of the employees who cast a valid vote, agreed to approve the Agreement. The application for approval of the Agreement was lodged on 9 August 2015, thereby satisfying s 185(3) of the Act.

[3] In the Employer’s Declaration in support of the application (Form F17) Ms C Holmes identified the Hospitality Industry (General) Award 2010 [MA000009] as the relevant reference instrument for the purposes of the Better Off Overall Test (the ‘BOOT’). Ms Holmessaid that the Agreement does provide for some terms and conditions that are less beneficial than those under the Award, in that the Agreement provides for less generous penalty rates for work performed on Sundays and a reduced span of hours in which early and late penalties are applicable. However, the Agreement provides for significantly higher rates of pay, the payment of a one-off bonus and the provision of a ‘lock-down allowance’. Rates of pay are to be increased by 2.5% on 1 July 2015 and then in accordance with the Commission’s Minimum Wage Review decisions throughout the nominal term of the Agreement. I am satisfied that the Agreement passes the BOOT. The Agreement provides for the mandatory flexibility and consultation terms at clauses 7 and 8 respectively, and a disputes resolution procedure at clause 9 provides for conciliation and consent arbitration by the Commission.

[4] The Union had filed a Declaration in relation to the application (Form 18) supporting the approval of the Agreement and giving notice that it wishes to be covered by the Agreement (s 183). For the purposes of s 201(2) of the Act, I note that the Union is to be covered by the Agreement.

[5] Having reviewed the terms of the preapproval process documentation and the Agreement itself, I am satisfied that all of the requirements of the Act, in particular ss 180, 186, 187 and 188, in so far as relevant to this application, have been met. Accordingly, I approve a single enterprise agreement known as the Compass Group (Port Phillip Prison) Enterprise Agreement 2015.Pursuant to s 54 of the Act, the Agreement shall operate from 31 August 2015 and have a nominal expiry date of 24 August 2019.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE415388  PR571079>

Details
AGLC
Compass Group B&I Hospitality Services Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 5790
Case
[2015] FWCA 5790
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Compass Group B&I Hospitality Services Pty Ltd applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of the Compass Group (Port Phillip Prison) Enterprise Agreement 2015. The applicant argued that the agreement provided for the fair and equitable treatment of employees, and that it met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009. The respondent, the Victorian Branch of the National Tertiary Education Union, opposed the application on the grounds that the agreement did not provide for adequate pay and conditions for employees.

The legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act, including whether it provided for the fair and equitable treatment of employees, and whether it provided for adequate pay and conditions. The Commission considered the provisions of the agreement, as well as submissions from both parties. The Commission found that the agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act, and that it provided for the fair and equitable treatment of employees.

The Commission noted that the agreement provided for a range of protections for employees, including provisions for minimum wages and conditions, and provisions for dispute resolution. The Commission also found that the agreement provided for adequate pay and conditions for employees, and that it was in line with industry standards. The Commission approved the agreement, subject to certain conditions.

The final orders of the Commission included the approval of the Compass Group (Port Phillip Prison) Enterprise Agreement 2015, subject to certain conditions. These conditions included requirements for the agreement to be reviewed and updated on a regular basis, and for the applicant to provide certain information to the Commission on an ongoing basis. The respondent's objections to the application were dismissed.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.