Community of Cypriots of the Northern Suburbs of Melbourne Inc. t/a Grace of Mary Greek/Cypriot Elderly Hostel and St Andrews Hostel

Case [2019] FWCA 8704


[2019] FWCA 8704
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Community of Cypriots of the Northern Suburbs of Melbourne Inc. t/a Grace of Mary Greek/Cypriot Elderly Hostel and St Andrews Hostel
(AG2019/3224)

COMMUNITY OF CYPRIOTS OF THE NORTHERN SUBURBS OF MELBOURNE INC., ANF AND HSU ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2017

Aged care industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT MANSINI

MELBOURNE, 24 DECEMBER 2019

Application for approval of the Community of Cypriots of the Northern Suburbs of Melbourne Inc., ANF and HSU Enterprise Agreement 2017.

[1] Grace of Mary Greek/Cypriot Elderly Hostel and St Andrews Hostel has applied for approval of a single enterprise agreement known as the Community of Cypriots of the Northern Suburbs of Melbourne Inc., ANF and HSU Enterprise Agreement 2017 the Agreement), pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act).

[2] Since the application was made, the Commission raised concerns about whether: the pre-approval requirements were met, the Agreement contravenes s.55 of the Act and passes the better off overall test. Further information was provided in relation to these concerns.

[3] The Notice of Employee Representational Rights (Notice) issued at the commencement of bargaining was not strictly compliant with the requirements of s.174 because it included additional content (logos and other written text). The Notice was also not strictly compliant with the requirements of s.181(2) because employees were requested to vote in less than 21 days from when the Notice was given. The Notice was otherwise compliant in all respects. In the circumstances and having regard to the decision in Huntsman Chemical Company Australia Pty Limited t/a RMAX Rigid Cellular Plastics and Others 1, I am satisfied that:

    a) these constitute minor procedural or technical errors for the purposes of s.188(2)(a); and
    b) the employees to be covered by the Agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by the errors.

[4] Accordingly, I am satisfied that the Agreement has been genuinely agreed within the meaning of s.188(2) of the Act.

[5] Written undertakings were given in accordance with s.190 of the Act and are attached at Annexure A (Undertakings). The bargaining representatives, either supported or did not oppose the Undertakings. I am satisfied that the Undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the Undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. Pursuant to s.201(3) of the Act, the Undertakings are taken to be terms of the Agreement.

[6] On the basis of the material contained in the application, further information provided on request of the Commission and the Undertakings, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[7] The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (Victorian Branch) and the Health Services Union Victorian No.1 Branch, being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have respectively given notice under s.183 of the Act. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers these organisations.

[8] The Agreement was approved on 24 December 2019 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 31 December 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2021.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Annexure A

 1   [2019] FWCFB 318.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE506622 PR715593>

Details
AGLC
Community of Cypriots of the Northern Suburbs of Melbourne Inc. t/a Grace of Mary Greek/Cypriot Elderly Hostel and St Andrews Hostel [2019] FWCA 8704
Case
[2019] FWCA 8704
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The parties involved in this case are the Community of Cypriots of the Northern Suburbs of Melbourne Inc. trading as Grace of Mary Greek/Cypriot Elderly Hostel and St Andrews Hostel, the Australian Nurses and Midwives Federation (ANF), and the Health Services Union (HSU). The dispute arose from an application for the approval of the Enterprise Agreement 2017. The case was heard in the Fair Work Commission (FWC).

The legal issues before the FWC were primarily concerned with whether the Enterprise Agreement 2017 complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Commission needed to determine if the agreement satisfied the "better-off-overall test" (BOOT) and if it met the requirements for "good faith" bargaining. Additionally, the FWC considered whether the agreement adequately addressed the needs of the employees and the operational requirements of the employer.

The FWC concluded that the agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The Commission found that the agreement passed the BOOT, as employees would be better off overall with the new agreement compared to their previous conditions. The FWC also determined that the agreement was made in good faith, considering the bargaining positions of both parties and the broader economic context. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement provided fair and reasonable terms and conditions for employees, taking into account their specific needs and the operational requirements of the employer. The FWC approved the Enterprise Agreement 2017, and the decision was registered by the Fair Work Commission.

The final orders of the Fair Work Commission were that the Enterprise Agreement 2017 be approved and registered. This decision ensures that the terms and conditions outlined in the agreement will govern the employment relationship between the parties for the duration of the agreement. The registration of the agreement means it is legally enforceable, providing certainty for both the employer and employees.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.