Community and Public Sector Union v Serco Traffic Camera Services (Vic) Pty Ltd T/A Serco Asia Pacific

Case [2023] FWC 3159


[2023] FWC 3159

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Community and Public Sector Union
v

Serco Traffic Camera Services (Vic) Pty Ltd T/A Serco Asia Pacific

(B2023/1304)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 30 NOVEMBER 2023

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Serco Traffic Camera Services (Vic) Pty Ltd T/A Serco Asia Pacific

  1. This is an application by the Community and Public Sector Union (CPSU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Serco Traffic Camera Services (Vic) Pty Ltd T/A Serco Asia Pacific (Serco or Employer). 

  1. I note that the Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union (ASU) has made a separate application for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed agreement.[1]

  1. On 29 November 2023, the Commission was advised that Serco objected to the Application. The objection concerned the nature of some of the ballot questions in the context of health and safety.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to conduct a hearing. During the hearing, the parties reached an accommodation on the disputed questions. As a result of amendments to some of the ballot questions, the CPSU sought to amend its application accordingly, and Serco did not press its objections. Leave was granted to amend the application.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Ms Lisa Pearce, Industrial Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the CPSU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Serco, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.  

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by the Vero Engagement & Voting Solutions Pty Ltd (Vero Voting). Vero Voting has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.[2]

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 14 December 2023.[3] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR768840.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matter (B2023/1303). To the extent that this matter involves any additional bargaining representatives, the Commission will also issue the Order requiring their attendance at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] B2023/1303.

[2] Vero Engagement & Voting Solutions Pty Ltd T/A Vero Voting[2023] FWC 1531.

[3] This date was established by the Commission following consultation with the parties and is, in effect, ten working days from the date effect of the Order.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR768841>

Details
AGLC
Community and Public Sector Union v Serco Traffic Camera Services (Vic) Pty Ltd T/A Serco Asia Pacific [2023] FWC 3159
Case
[2023] FWC 3159
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Community and Public Sector Union (CPSU) made an application under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 to the Fair Work Commission for a protected action ballot order. This application was in relation to certain employees of Serco Traffic Camera Services (Vic) Pty Ltd, trading as Serco Asia Pacific. Serco objected to the ballot, raising concerns about the nature of some of the ballot questions, particularly those related to health and safety. The Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union (ASU) also made a separate application for a protected action ballot order concerning the same proposed agreement. The application was heard by Deputy President Hampton in Adelaide on 30 November 2023.

The legal issues before the Commission were whether the CPSU had met the notification time requirements and all other conditions under section 443 of the Act. Additionally, the court needed to determine whether the ballot questions were appropriate and whether the specified voting agent, Vero Engagement & Voting Solutions Pty Ltd (Vero Voting), was qualified to conduct the ballot. Serco's objections centered on the health and safety-related questions, but these were resolved during the hearing as the parties reached an accommodation.

Deputy President Hampton concluded that the CPSU had satisfied all the requirements under section 443(1) of the Act, including the notification time for the proposed agreement. The court accepted that the CPSU had genuinely been trying to reach an agreement with Serco. The objections regarding the ballot questions were resolved by amending some of the questions, and Serco did not press its objections further. Vero Voting was deemed qualified to conduct the ballot under section 468A of the Act. The court set the closing date for voting as 14 December 2023, establishing the ballot period for the purpose of section 448A(2) of the Act.

The Fair Work Commission issued an order granting the CPSU's application for a protected action ballot. The order mandated the ballot to be conducted by Vero Voting and established the closing date for voting as 14 December 2023. Additionally, the matter was assigned to another Commission member to conduct the compulsory conciliation conference along with another related matter. The Commission also issued an order requiring the attendance of any additional bargaining representatives at the conference and may issue directions to ensure meaningful negotiations.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.