Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Wormald Australia Pty Ltd

Case [2025] FWC 258


[2025] FWC 258

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
v

Wormald Australia Pty Ltd

(B2025/168)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT WRIGHT

SYDNEY, 29 JANUARY 2025

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Wormald Australia Pty Ltd

  1. This is an application by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Wormald Australia Pty Ltd (Wormald or Employer).

  1. On 29 January 2025, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of James Little, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the CEPU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Wormald, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of  the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 12 February 2025.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR783763.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR783764>

Details
AGLC
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Wormald Australia Pty Ltd [2025] FWC 258
Case
[2025] FWC 258
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia versus Wormald Australia Pty Ltd was brought before the Fair Work Commission under Section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The union sought an order for a protected action ballot to be conducted among certain employees of Wormald Australia Pty Ltd. The employer did not object to the application, leading the Commission to determine the matter without a hearing.

The central legal issue before the Commission was whether the union had met all the requirements under the Act to hold a protected action ballot. The union argued that it had been genuinely attempting to reach an agreement with the employer and had followed the necessary procedures, including providing a notification time for the proposed agreement. The Commission also needed to determine the closing date for voting in the ballot.

The Deputy President, Wright, determined that the union had satisfied all the requirements under Section 443(1) of the Act. The Commission concluded that a notification time existed for the proposed agreement and that the union had genuinely tried to reach an agreement. As such, the application for a ballot was approved. The ballot was to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS), an approved agent under Section 468A of the Act. The Deputy President set the closing date for voting as 12 February 2025, which was 10 working days from the making of the Order. This decision was made in line with the union's request and established the ballot period for the purpose of Section 448A(2) of the Act.

The Commission issued an Order separately in PR783763 and assigned the matter to another Member for a compulsory conciliation conference. This Member would issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives at the conference and likely issue Directions to ensure the parties were ready for meaningful negotiations. This decision facilitated the process of reaching an agreement between the union and the employer, ensuring fair work practices were upheld.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.