| [2025] FWC 178 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
v
Woolworths Format Development Pty Limited & Woolworths Group Ltd
(B2025/112)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 20 JANUARY 2025 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Woolworths Format Development Pty Limited & Woolworths Group Ltd.
This is an application by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Woolworths Format Development Pty Limited & Woolworths Group Ltd (collectively Woolworths or Employers).
On 20 January 2025, the Commission was advised that the Employer did not object to the Application following discussion between the parties. The parties communicated a consent position and I have amended the application to reflect that position. Accordingly, I have decided that the matter will be determined on the papers without the need for a hearing.
I note that in the present case, the parties are bargaining in relation to an enterprise agreement to replace the Woolworths Format Development (Queensland Service) Enterprise Agreement 2020.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Luke Barden, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the CEPU in bargaining with the Employers and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Woolworths, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 5 February 2025.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
An Order has been separately issued in PR783450.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the anticipated commencement of the ballot and was the period sought in the application.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR783451>
- AGLC
- Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Woolworths Format Development Pty Limited & Woolworths Group Ltd [2025] FWC 178
- Case
- [2025] FWC 178
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the conditions stipulated in section 443(1) of the Act had been met, which are necessary for the Commission to grant a protected action ballot order. These conditions included the demonstration that the union had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement and that there was a notification period for the proposed agreement. The Commission was satisfied that these conditions were met based on the declaration provided by Luke Barden, the Organiser for the CEPU, and the steps taken in the bargaining process. Additionally, the Commission confirmed that Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS) was an approved ballot agent under section 468A of the Act and thus authorized to conduct the ballot.
The Deputy President of the Commission determined that the voting for the ballot should close on 5 February 2025, effectively setting the ballot period under section 448A(2) of the Act. An Order was issued to assign the matter to another Commission member for a compulsory conciliation conference, with directions to ensure that the parties attend ready to negotiate meaningfully. The decision concluded with the issuance of an Order to conduct the ballot by CiVS within the specified timeframe.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.