Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Water Infrastructure Group Pty Ltd

Case [2014] FWC 5602


[2014] FWC 5602
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.236—Majority support determination

“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU); Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
v
Water Infrastructure Group Pty Ltd
(B2014/1214)

COMMISSIONER RYAN

MELBOURNE, 15 AUGUST 2014

Application for a majority support determination: Water Infrastructure Group Pty Ltd - site affected 400 Blackrock Road, Connewarre, Victoria 3227.

[1] On 5 August 2014 the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) and the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) (the Applicants) applied pursuant to section 236 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) for a majority support determination.

[2] The Applicants seek a determination that a majority of the employees who will be covered by a proposed single-enterprise agreement to be made with Water Infrastructure Group Pty Ltd located at 400 Blackrock Road, Connewarre, Victoria (the Employer) wish to bargain with their employer.

[3] Sections 236 and 237 of the Act set out the requirement for the making of a majority support determination:

    “236 Majority support determinations

    (1) A bargaining representative of an employee who will be covered by a proposed single-enterprise agreement may apply to FWA for a determination (a majority support determination) that a majority of the employees who will be covered by the agreement want to bargain with the employer, or employers, that will be covered by the agreement.

    (2) The application must specify:

      (a) the employer, or employers, that will be covered by the agreement; and

      (b) the employees who will be covered by the agreement.

    237 When FWA must make a majority support determination

    Majority support determination

    (1) FWA must make a majority support determination in relation to a proposed single-enterprise agreement if:

      (a) an application for the determination has been made; and

      (b) FWA is satisfied of the matters set out in subsection (2) in relation to the agreement.

    Matters of which FWA must be satisfied before making a majority support determination

    (2) FWA must be satisfied that:

      (a) a majority of the employees:

      (i) who are employed by the employer or employers at a time determined by FWA; and

      (ii) who will be covered by the agreement;

      want to bargain; and

      (b) the employer, or employers, that will be covered by the agreement have not yet agreed to bargain, or initiated bargaining, for the agreement; and

      (c) that the group of employees who will be covered by the agreement was fairly chosen; and

      (d) it is reasonable in all the circumstances to make the determination.

    (3) For the purposes of paragraph (2)(a), FWA may work out whether a majority of employees want to bargain using any method FWA considers appropriate.

    (3A) If the agreement will not cover all of the employees of the employer or employers covered by the agreement, FWA must, in deciding for the purposes of paragraph (2)(c) whether the group of employees who will be covered was fairly chosen, take into account whether the group is geographically, operationally or organisationally distinct.

    Operation of determination

    (4) The determination comes into operation on the day on which it is made.”

[4] The AMWU submits it has been seeking the Employer’s agreement to enter into bargaining for a new agreement since approximately May 2014 and that the Employer had refused such requests.

[5] The Applicants have filed a confidential petition signed by 9 employees dated between 29 and 31 July 2014, which states that those employees want to bargain for a new enterprise agreement with the Employer and that they want the Applicants to represent them in such bargaining

[6] The Employer has filed a list of employees who would be covered by the proposed enterprise agreement.

[7] I have examined both the petition and the list of employees.

[8] On the basis of the material put before me, I am satisfied that the AMWU and CEPU are bargaining representatives for the employees concerned and are, therefore, capable of making this application for a majority support determination.

[9] I am satisfied that a majority of the employees employed by the Employer who will be covered by the agreement want to bargain.

[10] I am satisfied that the Employer has not yet agreed to bargain or initiated bargaining for the agreement.

[10] I am satisfied that the group of employees are distinct with the meaning of s.237(3A) and I accept that they have been fairly chosen as required by s.237(2)(c) of the Act.

[11] Given that all of the requirements of s.237(2) of the Act have been met, I am obliged to issue the determination in accordance with s.237(1). A determination will issue with this decision.

[12] As a result of the determination being issued, the Employer must now take all reasonable steps to issue a notice of employee representational rights to each relevant employee as required by sections 173 and 174 of the Act. I note that s.173(3) requires, in effect, that the notice be issued within 14 days of the determination being made.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR554350>

Details
AGLC
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Water Infrastructure Group Pty Ltd [2014] FWC 5602
Case
[2014] FWC 5602
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the Fair Work Commission was an application for a majority support determination by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia against Water Infrastructure Group Pty Ltd. The site in question was located at 400 Blackrock Road, Connewarre, Victoria 3227. The union sought to establish that it was the appropriate bargaining representative for the employees of the respondent company, aiming to negotiate a new enterprise agreement.

The primary legal issue that the Commission had to address was whether the union had the requisite support of a majority of the eligible employees to be recognised as the appropriate bargaining representative. This involved assessing the evidence provided by both parties and determining whether the union's claim was supported by a majority of the employees who were eligible to be represented. The Commission had to consider the methodology used to ascertain the employees' preferences and the validity of the ballot process.

In examining the evidence, the Commission found that the union had demonstrated a clear majority of support among the eligible employees, as evidenced by the results of the ballot. The Commission was satisfied with the process followed in conducting the ballot and the manner in which the employees' preferences were collected and counted. Consequently, the Commission ruled in favour of the union, recognising it as the appropriate bargaining representative for the employees of Water Infrastructure Group Pty Ltd. The decision was made on the basis that the union had met the legal requirements for majority support and that the process was conducted fairly and in accordance with the relevant legislation.

The Fair Work Commission ordered that the union be recognised as the appropriate bargaining representative for the employees of Water Infrastructure Group Pty Ltd at the specified site. This determination allows the union to negotiate on behalf of the employees for a new enterprise agreement, subject to the legal framework governing such negotiations. The decision was binding on both parties and marked the beginning of formal negotiations for the new agreement.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.