Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Ventia (Australia) Pty Ltd, Downer Utilities Australia Pty Ltd & Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty..

Case [2025] FWC 1920


[2025] FWC 1920

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
v

Ventia (Australia) Pty Ltd, Downer Utilities Australia Pty Ltd & Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Ltd T/A Confluence Water

(B2025/1084)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 4 JULY 2025

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Ventia (Australia) Pty Ltd, Downer Utilities Australia Pty Ltd & Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Ltd T/A Confluence Water

  1. This is an application by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Ventia (Australia) Pty Ltd (Ventia), Downer Utilities Australia Pty Ltd (Downer) & Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Ltd (Jacobs) trading as Confluence Water (Confluence Water or Employers).

  1. On 3 July 2025, the Commission was advised that subject to one caveat, the Employers did not object to the Application. The Employers contended that was not an employer covered by the present bargaining and would not be subject to the proposed enterprise agreement. They sought, in effect, that Jacobs not be included in the proposed order. The CEPU was requested to advise the Commission about its position on this aspect but has not responded in a timely manner.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing. In terms of Jacobs, I observe that the present enterprise agreement covers Ventia and Downer but does not cover Jacobs. In the absence of any position from the CEPU on this aspect, I have decided to issue the order applicable to Ventia and Downer, but not Jacobs. However, I grant leave to the CEPU to seek to amend the order to include Jacobs should it have proper grounds to do so. In that event, any such application should be made as a matter of immediate priority, and I would seek to hear all parties and determine such before the commencement of the ballot itself.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Jesse Savill, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the CEPU in bargaining with Ventia and Downer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with them, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Vero Engagement and Voting Solutions Pty Ltd (Vero Voting). Vero Voting has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 18 July 2025.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR788913.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR788914>

Details
AGLC
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Ventia (Australia) Pty Ltd, Downer Utilities Australia Pty Ltd & Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty.. [2025] FWC 1920
Case
[2025] FWC 1920
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Fair Work Commission (FWC) dealt with an application for a protected action ballot order made by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) against Ventia (Australia) Pty Ltd, Downer Utilities Australia Pty Ltd, and Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Ltd T/A Confluence Water. The CEPU sought the order under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 for employees of the named employers. The Employers did not object to the application, except for Jacobs, which argued it was not covered by the proposed enterprise agreement. Jacobs sought exclusion from the order. The CEPU did not provide a timely response regarding Jacobs' position, leading the Deputy President Hampton to issue the order applicable only to Ventia and Downer, with leave granted to the CEPU to seek amendment if it had proper grounds to include Jacobs.

The legal issues before the FWC centred on the applicability of the proposed enterprise agreement to Jacobs and the procedural correctness of the ballot process, including the timing and method of conducting the ballot. The CEPU argued that it had been genuinely attempting to reach an agreement with Ventia and Downer, as evidenced by the declaration of Jesse Savill, Organiser, which was supported by the material before the FWC. The Deputy President considered the requirements under section 443(1) of the Act and found that the notification time for the proposed agreement was met, and all necessary conditions for the ballot were satisfied.

The FWC issued an order granting the ballot to be conducted by Vero Engagement and Voting Solutions Pty Ltd, approved as a ballot agent under section 468A of the Act. The voting period was set to close on 18 July 2025, establishing a 10-working-day ballot period. The Deputy President also directed that a compulsory conciliation conference be held under section 448A of the Act, requiring all bargaining representatives to attend and negotiate meaningfully. The matter was assigned to another Member of the Commission for further proceedings.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.