| [2025] FWC 489 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
v
Ventia Australia Pty Ltd
(B2025/263)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 18 FEBRUARY 2025 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Ventia Australia Pty Ltd
This is an application by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Ventia Australia Pty Ltd (Ventia or Employer).
I note that the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU)[1] has made a separate application for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement.
On 17 February 2025, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application as amended following discussions between the parties. The amendment concerned the extent of notice of industrial action to be provided.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Ian Gill, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the CEPU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Ventia, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 6 March 2025.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
Pursuant to section 443(5) of the Act, I am satisfied that there are relevant exceptional circumstances justifying the minimum period of written notice referred to in section 414(2)(b) of the Act being longer than three (3) working days. By consent, the Commission has specified five (5) working days as the minimum period of written notice required in respect of the industrial action taken by employees arising from the ballot questions in clause 5 of the Order.
An Order has been separately issued in PR784486.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matter. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] B2025/262.
[2] This is, in effect, 11 working days from the making of the Order and was the specific date sought in the application.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR784487>
- AGLC
- Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Ventia Australia Pty Ltd [2025] FWC 489
- Case
- [2025] FWC 489
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the CEPU had satisfied the statutory requirements under section 443 of the Act to apply for a protected action ballot order. The Commission had to assess if the union had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with the employer, as required by section 443(1) of the Act. Additionally, the Commission needed to determine if the union had fulfilled the notification time requirements for the proposed agreement and if there were exceptional circumstances justifying a longer minimum period of written notice than the statutory three working days. The Commission also had to confirm the suitability of the proposed ballot agent and the appropriate closing date for the ballot.
The Deputy President of the Commission concluded that the CEPU had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with Ventia and that the statutory requirements for a protected action ballot order had been met. The Commission was satisfied with the steps taken by the CEPU in bargaining with Ventia, and it was determined that there was a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement. The ballot agent, Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS), was deemed eligible and authorised to conduct the ballot. The Commission set the closing date for the ballot as 6 March 2025, which was 11 working days from the making of the Order. Additionally, it was determined that exceptional circumstances justified extending the minimum period of written notice to five working days. The Commission separately issued an order in PR784486, and the matter was assigned to another Member for a compulsory conciliation conference.
The Fair Work Commission granted the CEPU's application for a protected action ballot order, specifying that the ballot must close on 6 March 2025. The Commission also established that five working days would be the minimum period of written notice required for industrial action arising from the ballot. This decision ensures that the employees have an opportunity to vote on potential industrial action in accordance with the provisions of the Fair Work Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.