Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd T/A TasNetworks

Case

[2015] FWC 8053

23 NOVEMBER 2015

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2015] FWC 8053
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.437—Protected action

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
v
Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd T/A TasNetworks
(B2015/1631)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT WELLS

HOBART, 23 NOVEMBER 2015

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Tasmanian Networks Pty Limited.

[1] This is an application by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) (the Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd trading as TasNetworks (the Respondent).

[2] Section 443(1) of the Act states:

    (1) The FWC must make a protected action ballot order in relation to a proposed enterprise agreement if:

      (a) an application has been made under section 437; and

      (b) the FWC is satisfied that each applicant has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach an agreement with the employer or the employees who are to be balloted.

    (2) The FWC must not make a protected action ballot order in relation to a proposed enterprise agreement except in the circumstances referred to in subsection (1).

    (3) A protected action ballot order must specify the following:

      (a) the name of each applicant for the order;

      (b) the group or groups of employees who are to be balloted;

      (c) the date by which voting in the protected action ballot closes;

      (d) the question or questions to be put to the employees who are to be balloted, including the nature of the proposed industrial action.

    (3A) for the purposes of paragraph (3)(c), the FWC must specify a date that will enable the protected action ballot to be conducted as expeditiously as practicable.

    (4) If the FWC decides that a person other than the Australian Electoral Commission is to be the protected action ballot agent for the protected action ballot, the protected action ballot order must also specify:

      (a) the person that the FWC decides, under subsection 444(1), is to be the protected action ballot agent; and

      (b) the person (if any) that the FWC decides, under subsection 444(3), is to be the independent advisor for the ballot.

    (5) If the FWC is satisfied, in relation to the proposed industrial action that is the subject of the protected action ballot, that there are exceptional circumstances justifying the period of written notice referred to in paragraph 414(2)(a) being longer than 3 working days, the protected action ballot order may specify a longer period of up to 7 working days.

    Note: Under subsection 414(1), before a person engages in employee claim action for a proposed enterprise agreement, a bargaining representative of an employee who will be covered by the agreement must give written notice of the action to the employer of the employee.

[3] On 20 November 2015 my associate was advised that the Respondent did not object to the application.

[4] I determined to hear the matter on 23 November 2015 and take submissions from the Applicant on the criteria contained in s.443 of the Act. The Respondent did not enter an appearance at hearing on the grounds of its non-objection to the application.

[5] On the basis of the oral submissions of the Applicant and the material before me, including the statutory declaration of Mr Todd Edwin Lambert of the Applicant setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

[6] An order has been separately issued in PR574206.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Appearances:

Mr Will Ash, Hall Payne Lawyers, for the Applicant

Hearing details:

23 November 2015

Hobart

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR574258>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0