Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v SPC Ardmona Operations Limited

Case

[2013] FWC 9272

26 NOVEMBER 2013

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2013] FWC 9272

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
v
SPC Ardmona Operations Limited
(B2013/1488)

“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU)
v
SPC Ardmona Operations Limited
(B2013/288)

The Australian Workers’ Union
v
SPC Ardmona Operations Limited
(B2013/1490)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT KOVACIC

MELBOURNE, 26 NOVEMBER 2013

Proposed protected action ballot by employees of SPC Ardmona Operations Limited.

[1] These are applications by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU), the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) and The Australian Workers’ Union (AWU) (collectively the Unions) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) for protected action ballot orders in relation to certain employees of SPC Ardmona Operations Limited (the Respondent).

[2] The Unions have provided Statutory Declarations addressing the statutory grounds. Those Statutory Declaration makes it clear that the parties have met on approximately six occasions (CEPU) since 26 July 2013, seven occasions (AMWU) since 26 July 2013 and nine occasions (AWU) since 9 July 2013 in an effort to negotiate the terms of an enterprise agreement and, whilst progress has been made, the parties are unable to reach agreement.

[3] On 25 November 2013 I was advised by Mr Brandon Hall, the Human Resources Manager Operations, that the Respondent did not intend to oppose either application. In doing so, the Respondent did not challenge that the Unions had been and were genuinely trying to reach agreement.

[1] In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

[2] On the basis of the material before me, I am satisfied that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met. Accordingly, I will make orders. The orders [PR544977, PR544978 and PR542979] are based on the draft orders provided by the Unions and will be issued in conjunction with this decision.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR544976>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0