| [2025] FWC 1162 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
v
SC Hydro Pty Ltd
(B2025/671)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT SLEVIN | SYDNEY, 28 APRIL 2025 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of SC Hydro Pty Ltd
This is an application by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of SC Hydro Pty Ltd (SC Hydro or Employer) that are currently covered by the S C Hydro Pty Ltd AWU and CFMEU Surface Works Greenfield Agreement 2021 – 2025.
I note that the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU), the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (CFMEU) and the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU)[1] have each made a separate application for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement.
On 28 April 2025, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Jarred Pearce, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the CEPU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with SC Hydro, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by Vero Engagement & Voting Solutions Pty Ltd (Vero). Vero has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 12 May 2025.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
An Order has been separately issued in PR786457.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matters. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] Respectively, B2025/659, B2025/665 and B2025/669.
[2] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the date sought in the application.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR786456>
- AGLC
- Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v SC Hydro Pty Ltd [2025] FWC 1162
- Case
- [2025] FWC 1162
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined whether the CEPU had genuinely attempted to negotiate with the employer and if the statutory notification period for the proposed agreement had been met. The court found that the CEPU had taken sufficient steps in bargaining and had met all requirements under section 443(1) of the Act. Vero Engagement & Voting Solutions Pty Ltd was approved to conduct the ballot, and the court set 12 May 2025 as the closing date for voting. This decision also established the ballot period under section 448A(2) of the Act.
Following the decision, the Commission assigned another member to conduct a compulsory conciliation conference, which would involve all bargaining representatives. This member will issue an order for their attendance and potentially provide directions to facilitate meaningful negotiations. The court's decision effectively allows the CEPU to proceed with the ballot for industrial action, subject to the specified conditions and timeframes.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.