Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Robert Bosch (Australia) Pty Ltd

Case [2024] FWC 3536


[2024] FWC 3536

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
v

Robert Bosch (Australia) Pty Ltd

(B2024/1654)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 19 DECEMBER 2024

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Robert Bosch (Australia) Pty Ltd

  1. This is an application by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Robert Bosch (Australia) Pty Ltd (Robert Bosch or Employer).

  1. I note that the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU)[1] has made a separate application for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement.

  1. On 18 December 2024, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Chelsea Hill, Legal Assistant, setting out the steps taken by the CEPU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Robert Bosch, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of  the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Vero Engagement & Voting Solutions Pty Ltd (Vero Voting). Vero Voting has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 10 January 2025.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. The structure of the draft order has been amended to reflect the Fair Work Commission’s standard template. In addition, the draft order contained certain “suggestions” for the ballot agent and these are not properly matters for an Order of this kind. Subject to the terms of the Order and the Act, and where appropriate, the ballot agent may consider them in the discharge of its obligations.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR782615.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matter. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] B2024/1661.

[2] This is, in effect, 13 working days from the making of the Order and was the date sought in the application.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR782616>

Details
AGLC
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Robert Bosch (Australia) Pty Ltd [2024] FWC 3536
Case
[2024] FWC 3536
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Fair Work Commission considered an application by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) for a protected action ballot order concerning certain employees of Robert Bosch (Australia) Pty Ltd. The CEPU sought this order under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 to facilitate a ballot for potential protected industrial action. The Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union had also filed a separate application for a ballot order concerning the same proposed enterprise agreement. Robert Bosch did not object to the CEPU's application.

The central legal issue was whether the CEPU had met the requirements set out in section 443 of the Act for a protected action ballot order. This included verifying that the union had genuinely attempted to negotiate with Robert Bosch and that a notification period had been met. The Commission also needed to determine an appropriate closing date for the ballot and ensure it complied with the statutory framework.

The Deputy President concluded that the CEPU had fulfilled the necessary conditions for a protected action ballot order. The CEPU provided a declaration by Chelsea Hill, a Legal Assistant, which detailed the union's efforts to reach an agreement with Robert Bosch. The Commission determined that the notification period had been met and that all statutory requirements were satisfied. Consequently, the Deputy President ordered the ballot to be conducted by Vero Engagement & Voting Solutions Pty Ltd, a certified ballot agent, and set the closing date for the ballot as 10 January 2025. This date was set to ensure the ballot period complied with section 448A(2) of the Act.

In light of these findings, the Commission issued an order to conduct the ballot and scheduled a compulsory conciliation conference to be held with another Member of the Commission. This conference aimed to facilitate meaningful negotiations between the parties involved in the proposed enterprise agreement.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.