| [2024] FWC 2301 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
v
Qantas Airways Limited
(B2024/1094)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 28 AUGUST 2024 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Qantas Airways Limited
This is an application by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Qantas Airways Limited (Qantas or Employer).
I note that the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU) and the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU)[1] has made a separate application for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement.
On 28 August 2024, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application as amended following discussions between the parties.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Matthew John Murphy, Union Official, setting out the steps taken by the CEPU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Qantas, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by Vero Engagement and Voting Solutions Pty Ltd (Vero). Vero has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 11 September 2024.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
An Order has been separately issued in PR778713.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matters. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] Respectively, B2024/1095 and B2024/1097.
[2] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the amended application.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR778714>
- AGLC
- Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Qantas Airways Limited [2024] FWC 2301
- Case
- [2024] FWC 2301
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issue before the FWC was whether the CEPU had met the requirements for a protected action ballot order under section 443(1) of the Fair Work Act. The CEPU needed to demonstrate that it had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with Qantas and that a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement existed. The FWC was satisfied, based on the declaration of Matthew John Murphy, a union official, that the CEPU had been genuinely trying to reach an agreement with Qantas and that all the requirements had been met. The FWC also needed to determine the closing date for voting in the ballot.
The FWC determined that the ballot would be conducted by Vero Engagement and Voting Solutions Pty Ltd, which had been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent. The FWC set the closing date for voting in the ballot as 11 September 2024, which was 10 working days from the making of the Order. The FWC noted that this date was the period sought in the amended application. The FWC also assigned the matter to another member to conduct the compulsory conciliation conference along with other related matters. The member would issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives and likely issue directions to ensure that the parties attended the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
The FWC issued an Order granting the CEPU's application for a protected action ballot order. The ballot was to be conducted by Vero Engagement and Voting Solutions Pty Ltd, with voting to close on 11 September 2024. This decision established the ballot period for the purpose of section 448A(2) of the Fair Work Act. The matter would be assigned to another member of the FWC to conduct the compulsory conciliation conference along with other related matters. Directions would also be issued to ensure that the parties attended the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.