Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Otis Elevator Company Pty Ltd

Case [2025] FWC 2270


[2025] FWC 2270

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
v

Otis Elevator Company Pty Ltd

(B2025/1237)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 5 AUGUST 2025

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Otis Elevator Company Pty Ltd

  1. This is an application by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Otis Elevator Company Pty Ltd (Otis Elevator or Employer).

  1. I note that the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU)[1] has made a separate application for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement.

  1. On 4 August 2025, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application if amended by the CEPU to remove one of the proposed ballot questions, and if an appropriate (emergency call-out) undertaking was provided by the Applicant. The CEPU has agreed to remove the disputed ballot question.

  1. In the circumstances, I have granted leave to amend the application and decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. I observe that the parties have now also agreed for the CEPU to give the following undertaking as part of the subsequent notification of protected industrial action to the Employer:

In any and all circumstances, employees will remain available for entrapment release and emergency call outs for all customers.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Gabriel Brinduse, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the CEPU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Otis Elevator, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of  the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Vero Engagement & Voting Solutions Pty Ltd (Vero Voting). Vero Voting has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. I observe that the application provided in this matter contained some limited additional observations about the CEPU’s preference in relation to the updating and finalisation of the list of voters. These were not in a form suitable for inclusion in the Order and contradicted some of the other proposed provisions. In that light, I have issued the Order using the Commission’s standard approach, noting that this is also consistent with the role to be played by the Act and associated regulations on the conduct of the ballot. I also observe that the Ballot Agent may have regard to the proposals set out in the application to the extent that they are consistent with the Order and the proper conduct of a ballot of this kind.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 19 August 2025.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR790359.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference in conjunction with the related matter, should an order also be issued as a result of that application. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] B2025/1241.

[2] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR790360>

Details
AGLC
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Otis Elevator Company Pty Ltd [2025] FWC 2270
Case
[2025] FWC 2270
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Fair Work Commission heard an application from the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009, seeking an order for a protected action ballot in relation to certain employees of Otis Elevator Company Pty Ltd (Otis Elevator). The Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) also made a separate application for a protected action ballot order regarding the same proposed enterprise agreement. Otis Elevator did not object to the CEPU's application, provided that one of the proposed ballot questions was removed and an appropriate emergency call-out undertaking was given by the CEPU. The CEPU agreed to amend the application accordingly and provide the required undertaking.

The key legal issue before the Commission was whether the CEPU had met the statutory requirements for a protected action ballot under the Fair Work Act. The Commission needed to determine whether all necessary conditions, including the notification period and the requirements of section 443(1), were satisfied. Additionally, the Commission had to decide on the appropriate date for the closure of voting and the conduct of the ballot by Vero Engagement & Voting Solutions Pty Ltd, which was approved as an eligible ballot agent.

After reviewing the application, the declarations, and the agreement between the parties, the Deputy President was satisfied that the CEPU had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with Otis Elevator and that all requirements for a protected action ballot had been met. The Deputy President granted leave to amend the application, removed the disputed ballot question, and set the closing date for voting at 19 August 2025. The Deputy President also noted that the ballot agent could consider the CEPU's proposals, provided they aligned with the Order and the proper conduct of the ballot. An Order was issued in this matter and another Order was issued separately in PR790359. A compulsory conciliation conference was scheduled for another Member of the Commission to conduct in conjunction with the related matter.

The final orders included the approval of the amended application, the setting of the ballot period, and the requirement for all bargaining representatives to attend the compulsory conciliation conference. The CEPU was also required to provide an emergency call-out undertaking as part of the notification of protected industrial action to Otis Elevator.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.