Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Nilsen (SA) Pty Ltd

Case [2022] FWC 1423


[2022] FWC 1423

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437—Protected action

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
v

Nilsen (SA) Pty Ltd

(B2022/529)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT CLANCY

MELBOURNE, 7 JUNE 2022

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Nilsen (SA) Pty Ltd.

  1. This is an application by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Nilsen (SA) Pty Ltd (the Respondent).

  1. On 6 June 2022, my Associate was advised that the Respondent does not object to the application.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Alex Capper of the Applicant setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The Applicant also sought that a person other than the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) be the ballot agent for the protected action ballot. This course was not opposed by the Respondent. The person proposed in the application as the protected action ballot agent is Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd trading as CiVS (CiVS). Mr Michael M Michael, the Managing Director of CiVs has provided a statutory declaration setting out that he would carry out the functions of the protected ballot agent for CiVS, and that he has relevant experience in conducting protected action ballots. I am satisfied that CiVS is a fit and proper person to conduct the ballot. I am also satisfied that Mr Michael and CiVS are capable of ensuring the secrecy and security of the votes and of conducting the ballot expeditiously. CiVs has agreed to be the protected action ballot agent and Mr Michael and CiVS are bound to comply with the Privacy Act 1998 with respect to the handling of the information relating to the protected action ballot.

  1. Therefore I appoint CiVS as the protected action ballot agent.

  1. An order has been separately issued in PR742362.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR742361>

Details
AGLC
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Nilsen (SA) Pty Ltd [2022] FWC 1423
Case
[2022] FWC 1423
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Fair Work Commission heard an application from the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia for an order allowing a protected action ballot of employees of Nilsen (SA) Pty Ltd. The application was made under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Respondent did not object to the application. The Deputy President, Clancy, therefore determined the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

The legal issues before the Deputy President were whether the notification time in relation to the proposed agreement had passed, and whether the requirements of section 443(1) of the Act had been met. The Applicant had provided a declaration stating that it had been genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent and that it had taken all necessary steps in bargaining with the Respondent. The Deputy President was satisfied that the notification time had passed and that the requirements of section 443(1) of the Act had been met.

The Deputy President also considered the Applicant's request for a person other than the Australian Electoral Commission to be the ballot agent for the protected action ballot. The Applicant proposed Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd trading as CiVS (CiVS) as the ballot agent. The Respondent did not oppose this course of action. The Deputy President was satisfied that CiVS was a fit and proper person to conduct the ballot and that Mr Michael, the Managing Director of CiVS, and CiVS were capable of ensuring the secrecy and security of the votes and of conducting the ballot expeditiously. Therefore, the Deputy President appointed CiVS as the protected action ballot agent.

The Fair Work Commission ordered that CiVS be the protected action ballot agent for the proposed protected action ballot of employees of Nilsen (SA) Pty Ltd. The order was issued in PR742362.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.