| [2022] FWC 1423 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437—Protected action
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
v
Nilsen (SA) Pty Ltd
(B2022/529)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT CLANCY | MELBOURNE, 7 JUNE 2022 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Nilsen (SA) Pty Ltd.
This is an application by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Nilsen (SA) Pty Ltd (the Respondent).
On 6 June 2022, my Associate was advised that the Respondent does not object to the application.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Alex Capper of the Applicant setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The Applicant also sought that a person other than the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) be the ballot agent for the protected action ballot. This course was not opposed by the Respondent. The person proposed in the application as the protected action ballot agent is Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd trading as CiVS (CiVS). Mr Michael M Michael, the Managing Director of CiVs has provided a statutory declaration setting out that he would carry out the functions of the protected ballot agent for CiVS, and that he has relevant experience in conducting protected action ballots. I am satisfied that CiVS is a fit and proper person to conduct the ballot. I am also satisfied that Mr Michael and CiVS are capable of ensuring the secrecy and security of the votes and of conducting the ballot expeditiously. CiVs has agreed to be the protected action ballot agent and Mr Michael and CiVS are bound to comply with the Privacy Act 1998 with respect to the handling of the information relating to the protected action ballot.
Therefore I appoint CiVS as the protected action ballot agent.
An order has been separately issued in PR742362.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR742361>
- AGLC
- Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Nilsen (SA) Pty Ltd [2022] FWC 1423
- Case
- [2022] FWC 1423
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Deputy President were whether the notification time in relation to the proposed agreement had passed, and whether the requirements of section 443(1) of the Act had been met. The Applicant had provided a declaration stating that it had been genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent and that it had taken all necessary steps in bargaining with the Respondent. The Deputy President was satisfied that the notification time had passed and that the requirements of section 443(1) of the Act had been met.
The Deputy President also considered the Applicant's request for a person other than the Australian Electoral Commission to be the ballot agent for the protected action ballot. The Applicant proposed Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd trading as CiVS (CiVS) as the ballot agent. The Respondent did not oppose this course of action. The Deputy President was satisfied that CiVS was a fit and proper person to conduct the ballot and that Mr Michael, the Managing Director of CiVS, and CiVS were capable of ensuring the secrecy and security of the votes and of conducting the ballot expeditiously. Therefore, the Deputy President appointed CiVS as the protected action ballot agent.
The Fair Work Commission ordered that CiVS be the protected action ballot agent for the proposed protected action ballot of employees of Nilsen (SA) Pty Ltd. The order was issued in PR742362.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.