| [2025] FWC 2791 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
v
Nilsen (NSW) Pty. Ltd.
(B2025/1460)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT CLANCY | MELBOURNE, 18 SEPTEMBER 2025 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Nilsen (NSW) Pty. Ltd. – non-AEC ballot agent electronic voting
This is an application by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Nilsen (NSW) Pty. Ltd. (Nilsen or Employer).
On 18 September 2025, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Mackenzie Leighton, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the CEPU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Nilsen, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by Vero Engagement & Voting Solutions Pty Ltd (Vero Voting). Vero Voting has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 2 October 2025.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
An Order has been separately issued in PR791862.
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR791863>
- AGLC
- Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Nilsen (NSW) Pty. Ltd [2025] FWC 2791
- Case
- [2025] FWC 2791
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The main issue before the Commission was whether the union had met all the legal requirements to hold the vote. The Commission needed to determine if the union had genuinely tried to negotiate with the company and if the vote would be conducted properly. The union had provided a declaration from its Organiser, Mackenzie Leighton, stating that they had been genuinely trying to reach an agreement with the company.
The Commission decided that the union had met all the requirements and granted the application. They set the closing date for the vote as 2 October 2025, which was 10 working days from when the decision was made. The vote will be conducted by Vero Engagement & Voting Solutions Pty Ltd, which is authorised to conduct the ballot. The Commission will also hold a compulsory conciliation conference to help the parties negotiate a new agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.