Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Cascade Brewery Company Pty Ltd

Case [2025] FWC 2287


[2025] FWC 2287

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
v

Cascade Brewery Company Pty Ltd

(B2025/1244)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 7 AUGUST 2025

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Cascade Brewery Company Pty Ltd

  1. This is an application by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Cascade Brewery Company Pty Ltd (Cascade or Employer). 

  1. On 6 August 2025, the Commission was advised that the Employer did not object to the Application. 

  1. Following the Commission seeking clarification about one of the proposed ballot questions, the CEPU sought to delete that element. This appropriately dealt with the issue raised.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to grant leave to amend the application and determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing. 

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Chris Clark, State Secretary, setting out the steps taken by the CEPU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Cascade, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met. 

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC). 

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 18 September 2025.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR790415.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations. 

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] This is, in effect, 30 working days from the making of the Order and is the minimum period required by the AEC.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR790416>

Details
AGLC
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Cascade Brewery Company Pty Ltd [2025] FWC 2287
Case
[2025] FWC 2287
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involves the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) and Cascade Brewery Company Pty Ltd (Cascade). The CEPU applied to the Fair Work Commission for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Cascade. The application was made under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The employer did not object to the application, and the CEPU subsequently amended the proposed ballot question to address concerns raised by the Commission.

The legal issues before the Deputy President were whether the CEPU had met the requirements for a protected action ballot, including the notification period and the genuine attempt to reach agreement as required by section 443 of the Fair Work Act. The Deputy President examined the declaration by Chris Clark, the State Secretary of CEPU, which detailed the union's bargaining efforts with Cascade. The Commission was satisfied that the CEPU had genuinely tried to reach an agreement and that the requirements for the notification period and the application had been met.

The Deputy President granted the CEPU's application for a protected action ballot order and determined the matter on the papers. The Deputy President concluded that the CEPU had fulfilled the necessary conditions for a ballot under section 443(1) of the Act. The ballot is to be conducted by the Australian Electoral Commission, with voting to close on 18 September 2025. This date establishes the ballot period for the purpose of section 448A(2) of the Act. The matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission for the compulsory conciliation conference.

The Fair Work Commission issued an order for the protected action ballot and assigned the case to another member for the compulsory conciliation conference. The order also required all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement to attend the conference.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.