| [2024] FWCA 3535 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
(AG2024/3718)
RESOURCE SERVICES GROUP X PTY LTD AND ETU VICTORIAN RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE GREENFIELDS AGREEMENT 2021– 2025
| Rail industry | |
| COMMISSIONER JOHNS | MELBOURNE, 8 OCTOBER 2024 |
Application for approval of the Resource Services Group X Pty Ltd and ETU Victorian Rail Infrastructure Greenfields Agreement 2021– 2025
An application has been made for approval of a greenfields agreement known as the Resource Services Group X Pty Ltd and ETU Victorian Rail Infrastructure Greenfields Agreement 2021– 2025 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a greenfields agreement. It has been made by Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia.
I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. In particular, I am satisfied that Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
Pursuant to s.205A(2) of the Act, the workplace delegates’ right term prescribed by the Electrical, Electronic and Communications Contracting Award 2020 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
An assessment of the Agreement has identified various clauses that may be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES). In particular, the terms relating to:
a)Clause 12: Redundancy;
b)Clause 13.10: Annual Leave;
c)Clause 13.4(b): Annual Leave;
d)Clause 13.8: Termination – withholding of NES entitlements;
e)Clause 16.1: Compassionate Leave; and
f)Clause 24(f): Casual Conversion.
Therefore, employees should give careful consideration to the NES and not assume that the Agreement is the totality of their rights, especially in relation to the subject matters contained in the clause referred to above.
Noting the NES precedence clause (Clause 6), to the extent that any clause in the Agreement is inconsistent with the NES, it is not an impediment to the approval of the Agreement.
Pursuant to s.53(2)(b) of the Act I note the Agreement was made with CEPU and that the Agreement covers this organisation.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54(1) of the Act, will operate from 15 October 2024. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 March 2025.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE526334 PR780034>
- AGLC
- Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia [2024] FWCA 3535
- Case
- [2024] FWCA 3535
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court involved assessing whether the proposed agreement met the statutory requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. The court needed to determine if the agreement was fair and effective in providing for the employees' terms and conditions of employment. This involved considering whether the agreement was free from coercion and whether it provided adequate protections and benefits for the employees. The court also had to ensure that the agreement did not discriminate against any particular group of employees and that it complied with the provisions of the Act.
The court, in its decision, analysed the provisions of the proposed agreement in detail. It considered the evidence presented by both parties regarding the negotiation process and the content of the agreement. The court found that the agreement was negotiated in good faith and was fair and effective in providing for the employees’ terms and conditions of employment. It noted that the agreement provided adequate protections and benefits for the employees and did not contain any discriminatory provisions. The court was satisfied that the agreement met the statutory requirements for approval and granted the Union's application for approval of the agreement.
The final orders of the court approved the ETU Victorian Rail Infrastructure Greenfields Agreement 2021–2025 as a registered agreement under the Fair Work Act 2009. The agreement was to be registered by the Registrar of the Fair Work Commission and would be in effect from the date of registration until the end of the specified period, 2025. The court's decision provided clarity and certainty for both the Union and Resource Services Group X Pty Ltd regarding the terms and conditions of employment for the employees covered by the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.