[2013] FWCA 1150 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
(AG2013/263)
TES MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL QLD PTY LTD & CEPU ELECTRICAL DIVISION QUEENSLAND ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012 - 2015
Electrical contracting industry | |
COMMISSIONER SIMPSON | BRISBANE, 18 FEBRUARY 2013 |
Application for approval of the TES Mechanical Electrical Qld Pty Ltd & CEPU Electrical Division Queensland Enterprise Agreement 2012 - 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the TES Mechanical Electrical Qld Pty Ltd & CEPU Electrical Division Queensland Enterprise Agreement 2012 - 2015 (the Agreement). The Application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The CEPU, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.
[4] The agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54(1) it will operate from 26 February 2013. The nominal expiry date of the agreement is 31 December 2015.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code O, AE899961 PR534238>
- AGLC
- Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia [2013] FWCA 1150
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 1150
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the Enterprise Agreement's terms and the process by which it was negotiated to determine if it met the legal criteria for approval. The union argued that the agreement was fair and reasonable and had been negotiated in good faith. The employer, on the other hand, raised concerns about certain provisions of the agreement, suggesting they were not in line with the legal requirements. After careful consideration of the evidence and arguments presented, the court found that the Enterprise Agreement was compliant with the necessary legal standards. The court concluded that the agreement was fair and reasonable, and had been negotiated in good faith. Consequently, the court approved the Enterprise Agreement for the specified period.
In light of the findings, the court approved the Enterprise Agreement between the union and the employer for the period 2012 to 2015. The decision confirmed that the agreement met all the necessary legal requirements and could be implemented as a binding contract between the parties. The approval of the agreement ensured that the terms and conditions outlined within it would be enforceable, providing certainty and stability for both the union and the employer in their future dealings.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.