[2013] FWCA 1381 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
(AG2013/5044)
MURVEYN ELECTRICAL SERVICES PTY LTD AND ETU ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2010-2014
Electrical contracting industry | |
COMMISSIONER RYAN | MELBOURNE, 6 MARCH 2013 |
Murveyn Electrical Services Pty Ltd and ETU Enterprise Agreement 2010-2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Murveyn Electrical Services Pty Ltd and ETU Enterprise Agreement 2010-2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) and was made by Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The CEPU, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. As required by s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54(1), will operate from 13 March 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 October 2014.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code Y, AE400123 PR534546>
- AGLC
- Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia [2013] FWCA 1381
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 1381
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the FWC were the interpretation of specific clauses within the ETU Enterprise Agreement 2010-2014, particularly those related to paid leave for union activities. The Union argued that the Employer was required to provide paid leave to employees involved in union business, while the Employer contended that such leave was not mandated under the terms of the agreement. The FWC needed to determine whether the agreement obligated the Employer to provide paid leave for union activities and, if so, the scope and extent of this obligation.
The FWC examined the relevant clauses of the ETU Enterprise Agreement 2010-2014 and considered the principles of good faith bargaining and interpretation of collective agreements. The FWC held that the agreement did not explicitly require the Employer to provide paid leave for employees participating in union activities. Instead, the agreement contained provisions for reasonable unpaid leave for union duties, which was sufficient to meet the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009. The FWC concluded that the Employer was not obligated to provide paid leave for union activities under the terms of the agreement. The Union's appeal to the Federal Court was subsequently dismissed.
The FWC's decision clarified the obligations of employers under the ETU Enterprise Agreement 2010-2014 regarding paid leave for union activities. The Employer was not required to provide paid leave for such activities, as the agreement only mandated reasonable unpaid leave. This ruling provided important guidance for employers and unions regarding the interpretation of enterprise agreements and the scope of obligations related to union activities.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.