| [2015] FWCA 1279 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
(AG2015/1795)
HATCHMAN CONSTRUCTION SERVICES PTY LTD AND CEPU PLUMBING DIVISION UNION COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2011-2015
Plumbing industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT LAWRENCE | SYDNEY, 25 FEBRUARY 2015 |
Application for approval of the Hatchman Construction Services Pty Ltd and CEPU Plumbing Division Union Collective Agreement 2011 -2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Hatchman Construction Services Pty Ltd and CEPU Plumbing Division Union Collective Agreement 2011 -2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. As required by s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54(1) it will operate from 4 March 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 October 2015.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE412753 PR561326>
- AGLC
- Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia [2015] FWCA 1279
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 1279
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue for the court was whether the collective agreement complied with the relevant provisions of the Act, including the requirement that it not have the purpose or effect of undermining the operation of a registered agreement or of promoting industrial action. The court also had to consider whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, and whether it was consistent with the provisions of the Act relating to protected industrial action. Further, the court needed to examine whether the agreement adequately provided for the resolution of any disputes that might arise during its operation.
In reaching its decision, the court examined the terms of the agreement in detail and considered the arguments of both parties. The court found that the agreement did not have the purpose or effect of undermining the operation of a registered agreement or of promoting industrial action. The court also found that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, and was consistent with the provisions of the Act relating to protected industrial action. The court was satisfied that the agreement adequately provided for the resolution of any disputes that might arise during its operation. As a result, the court approved the agreement.
The court's approval of the collective agreement means that it will be registered and enforceable under the Fair Work Act. The agreement will provide a framework for the employment relationship between the union and Hatchman Construction Services Pty Ltd for the period 2011 to 2015, and will help to ensure a fair and productive workplace for all parties.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.