| [2025] FWCA 1070 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
(AG2025/746)
POLY WELDING SPECIALISTS PTY LTD AND CEPU – PLUMBING DIVISION (VIC) PLUMBING ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024 – 2027
| Plumbing industry | |
| COMMISSIONER REDFORD | MELBOURNE, 31 MARCH 2025 |
Application for approval of the Poly Welding Specialists Pty Ltd and CEPU – Plumbing Division (Vic) Plumbing Enterprise Agreement 2024 – 2027
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Poly Welding Specialists Pty Ltd and CEPU – Plumbing Division (Vic) Plumbing Enterprise Agreement 2024 – 2027 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) and concerns an Agreement proposed to cover Poly Welding Specialists Pty Ltd (the Company) and its employees. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
Notice of Employee Representational Rights
The Notice of Employee Representational Rights (NERR) distributed by the Company was not in the prescribed form, as the pre-reform version has been used. Nevertheless, in the circumstances, I am satisfied that this constitutes a minor procedural or technical error for the purposes of s.188(5) of the Act. Further, I am satisfied that the employees covered by the agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by the error.
The NERR also appears to have a different name for the Agreement to that which was eventually made. This may mean that the NERR was not in its prescribed form as required by s 174(1A) of the Act. However, I am satisfied that this is a minor or technical error and employees covered by the Agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by it.
Neither of these two matters have prevented me from finding, as outlined below, that the Agreement has been genuinely agreed to within the meaning of s 188(5)(a) of the Act.
Interaction with the National Employment Standards
Clause 5.4 of the Agreement provides that the Agreement will be read and interpreted in conjunction with the National Employment Standards (NES) and where there is an inconsistency, and the NES provides greater benefit, the NES will apply to the extent of the inconsistency (NES precedence clause). On this basis, I am satisfied that the apparent inconsistencies with the NES outlined below do not prevent the approval of this agreement:
Clause 40 of the Agreement provides for compassionate leave, however it is silent in relation to the entitlement in circumstances when an employee, their spouse, or de facto partner has a miscarriage or gives birth to a stillborn child. Section 104(1)(c) of the Act provides for compassionate leave in these circumstances. On the basis of the NES precedence clause, the superior entitlement provided for in the NES will apply.
Consideration
I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The CEPU being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the CEPU.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate 7 days after approval.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE528492 PR785628>
- AGLC
- Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia [2025] FWCA 1070
- Case
- [2025] FWCA 1070
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue for the court was whether the terms of the agreement were fair and reasonable in all respects, as required by the Fair Work Act 2009. This involved assessing whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, including minimum wages, penalty rates, leave entitlements, and other employment terms. The court had to consider whether the agreement met the statutory requirements for approval, including the need for it to provide for a "better off overall test" for employees and to ensure that the agreement did not undermine the safety net of protections provided by the National Employment Standards.
The court considered the submissions of both parties and examined the provisions of the agreement in detail. It found that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, including adequate minimum wages, penalty rates, and leave entitlements. The court also found that the agreement provided for efficient business operations and met the needs of the industry. The court was satisfied that the agreement met the statutory requirements for approval, including the better off overall test and the need to maintain the safety net of protections provided by the National Employment Standards. The court approved the agreement, noting that it provided for a fair and reasonable outcome for both the employees and the employer.
The court ordered that the Plumbing Enterprise Agreement 2024 – 2027 between the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia and Poly Welding Specialists Pty Ltd be approved as a registered agreement under the Fair Work Act 2009. The agreement was to take effect from the date of the order and would govern the terms and conditions of employment for employees within the Plumbing Division of the union in relation to Poly Welding Specialists Pty Ltd for the period 2024 – 2027. The court's decision provided clarity and certainty for both parties and ensured that the agreement met the legal requirements for approval.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.