| [2025] FWCA 1089 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a greenfields agreement
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
(AG2025/768)
COMTEX ELECTRICAL PTY LTD & ETU NSW/ACT CONSTRUCTION UNION AGREEMENT 2025
| Electrical contracting industry | |
| COMMISSIONER REDFORD | MELBOURNE, 31 MARCH 2025 |
Application for approval of the Comtex Electrical Pty Ltd & ETU NSW/ACT Construction Union Agreement 2025
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Comtex Electrical Pty Ltd & ETU NSW/ACT Construction Union Agreement 2025 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) and concerns Comtex Electrical Pty Ltd (the Company).
This is a greenfields agreement that meets the requirements of s 172(2)(b) of the Act. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval has been met. In accordance with s 187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that the CEPU, is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement as required by s 187(5)(b).
Interaction with the National Employment Standards
Clause 16(a) of the Agreement provides that where the National Employment Standards (NES) provides a benefit, condition or entitlement more favourable in a particular respect than contained in the Agreement, the Agreement shall be “overridden” to the extent of any less favourable inconsistency. I take this to mean that in those circumstances, the NES provision will apply. On this basis, I am satisfied that the apparent inconsistencies with the NES outlined below do not prevent the approval of this agreement:
a.Clause 25 of the Agreement provides for compassionate leave, however it is silent in relation to the entitlement in circumstances when an employee, their spouse, or de facto partner has a miscarriage or gives birth to a stillborn child. Section 104(1)(c) of the Act provides for compassionate leave in these circumstances. On the basis of the NES precedence clause, the superior entitlement provided for in the NES will apply.
b.Clause 43(a)(iii) Clause 43(a)(iii) of the Agreement provides that severance pay is not payable where the employer finds suitable alternative employment. Section 120 of the Act deals with circumstances in which a variation to redundancy pay can be sought where an employer obtains other acceptable employment for an employee. In particular, an application is required to be made to the Commission for a determination. The operation of clause 16(a) of the Agreement – the NES precedence clause – is therefore likely to mean that despite clause 43(a)(iii), the amount of redundancy or severance pay cannot be varied without compliance with s 120 of the Act.
Consideration
Pursuant to s 53(2)(b) of the Act I note the Agreement was made with the CEPU and that the Agreement covers this organisation.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate 7 days after approval.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE528511 PR785672>
- AGLC
- Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia [2025] FWCA 1089
- Case
- [2025] FWCA 1089
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the agreement was in the best interests of the respondents' members. The applicant argued that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, while the respondent contended that the agreement did not adequately protect its members' interests. The Commission needed to determine whether the agreement met the statutory criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009.
In considering the matter, the Commission examined the terms and conditions of the agreement, including wages, hours of work, and other employment-related matters. The Commission also considered the views and submissions of both unions and their members. Ultimately, the Commission found that the agreement was in the best interests of the respondents' members, as it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment. The Commission approved the agreement, noting that it met the statutory criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009.
The Fair Work Commission approved the Comtex Electrical Pty Ltd & ETU NSW/ACT Construction Union Agreement 2025, finding that it was in the best interests of the respondents' members. The Commission noted that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment and met the statutory criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. The respondent's application for approval of the agreement was dismissed.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.