| [2016] FWCA 3374 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
(AG2016/3237)
TRUSTEE FOR THE NAVASKA UNIT TRUST T/A NAVASKA PTY LTD AND CEPU PLUMBING DIVISION MECHANICAL UNION COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2015 - 2019
Plumbing industry | |
COMMISSIONER GREGORY | MELBOURNE, 26 MAY 2016 |
Application for approval of the Trustee for The Navaska Unit Trust t/a Navaska Pty Ltd and CEPU Plumbing Division Mechanical Union Collective Agreement 2015 - 2019.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Trustee for The Navaska Unit Trust t/a Navaska Pty Ltd and CEPU Plumbing Division Mechanical Union Collective Agreement 2015 - 2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 2 June 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 October 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE419136 PR580806>
- AGLC
- Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia [2016] FWCA 3374
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 3374
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue was whether the proposed collective agreement complied with the Fair Work Act 2009 and its regulations. Specifically, the union needed to demonstrate that the agreement met the requirements for good faith bargaining and that it did not include any terms that would be unfair to the employees or the employer. The union also needed to show that it had genuinely sought to reach an agreement with the employer and that the agreement reflected the outcomes of those negotiations.
The Fair Work Commission found that the union had met its burden of proof. The commission was satisfied that the agreement was the product of genuine negotiations between the union and the employer, and that it met the requirements for good faith bargaining. The commission also found that the agreement did not contain any terms that would be unfair to either party. The commission approved the collective agreement, subject to certain modifications that addressed minor technical issues. The union and the employer were ordered to implement the agreement as modified by the commission.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.