| [2016] FWCA 3590 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
(AG2016/3368)
EXTINGUISHED FIRE (NSW) PTY LTD & CEPU NSW/NFIA SPRINKLER FITTING FIRE PROTECTION UNION ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT NSW & ACT 2015-2019
Plumbing industry | |
COMMISSIONER GREGORY | MELBOURNE, 2 JUNE 2016 |
Application for approval of the Extinguished Fire (NSW) Pty Ltd & CEPU NSW/NFIA Sprinkler Fitting Fire Protection Union Enterprise Agreement NSW & ACT 2015-2019.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Extinguished Fire (NSW) Pty Ltd & CEPU NSW/NFIA Sprinkler Fitting Fire Protection Union Enterprise Agreement NSW & ACT 2015-2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 9 June 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 September 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE419230 PR581120>
- AGLC
- Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia [2016] FWCA 3590
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 3590
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue was whether the proposed agreement complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act, specifically whether it met the ‘better off overall test’ (BOOT). This test assesses whether employees would be better off financially and in terms of conditions if the agreement were to be approved, compared to the applicable award or safety net. Additionally, the court needed to determine if the agreement adhered to the general protections provisions and did not include any terms that would be unfair to employees.
The Fair Work Commission found that the proposed agreement did indeed meet the BOOT. The commission concluded that employees would be better off overall, as the agreement provided for increased wages, improved working conditions, and additional benefits, all of which exceeded the minimum standards set by the applicable awards. The commission also found that the agreement did not contain any terms that would be considered unfair or detrimental to employees and complied with the general protections provisions of the Fair Work Act.
Consequently, the Fair Work Commission approved the proposed enterprise agreement, recognising it as a valid and binding agreement between the parties. The decision underscores the importance of ensuring that any proposed enterprise agreement not only meets the statutory requirements but also provides tangible benefits to employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.