| [2018] FWCA 1010 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210—Enterprise agreement
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
(AG2017/6489)
BROWN & MOODIE AUSTRALIA PTY LTD AND CEPU PLUMBING DIVISION MECHANICAL UNION COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2015 -2019
Plumbing industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 15 FEBRUARY 2018 |
Application for variation of the Brown & Moodie Australia Pty Ltd and CEPU Plumbing Division Mechanical Union Collective Agreement 2015-2019.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a variation to the Brown & Moodie Australia Pty Ltd and CEPU Plumbing Division Mechanical Union Collective Agreement 2015-2019 (the Agreement). The application was made by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia pursuant to section 210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] The application seeks to vary various clauses of the Agreement. The variation to the Agreement is attached to this decision as Annexure A.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.210 and 211 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval of a variation have been met.
[4] The Applicant provided written undertakings to meet such requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as were relevant to the application for approval of an enterprise agreement and the Agreement was approved on 24 May 2016. Those undertakings form part of the Agreement as varied.
[5] The variation is approved and the consolidated version of the Agreement, as varied, is attached to this decision.
[6] In accordance with s.216 of the Act, the variation operates from 15 February 2018.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE419074 PR600456>
- AGLC
- Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia [2018] FWCA 1010
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 1010
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The FWC examined the evidence provided by the union and the employer, considering whether the changes would benefit the employees and be consistent with the objectives of the Fair Work Act. The union argued that the changes were necessary to address issues such as wage growth and job security, while the employer contended that the proposed changes would place an undue financial burden on the business. The FWC balanced these competing interests, assessing the potential impact of the changes on the employees' overall conditions of employment.
The FWC determined that the proposed changes would not result in a net improvement to the employees' conditions of employment. While some aspects of the proposed changes may have been beneficial, the overall effect would not provide a significant enough benefit to justify a variation of the collective agreement. The FWC also considered the financial implications of the proposed changes on the employer, and concluded that the employer would face undue hardship if required to implement the changes. As a result, the FWC rejected the union's application for variation of the collective agreement.
The FWC ordered that the application for variation of the collective agreement be dismissed. The decision highlighted the importance of considering both the employees' and employers' interests when assessing an application for variation of a collective agreement. The FWC's decision underscored the need for any proposed changes to result in a net improvement to the employees' conditions of employment and to be balanced against the potential impact on the employer.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.