| [2018] FWCA 2384 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
(AG2018/1051)
LAMB & BELL PTY LTD AND CEPU - PLUMBING DIVISION VICTORIAN BRANCH ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016-2019
Plumbing industry | |
COMMISSIONER HARPER-GREENWELL | MELBOURNE, 27 APRIL 2018 |
Application for approval of the Lamb & Bell Pty Ltd and CEPU - Plumbing Division Victorian Branch Enterprise Agreement 2016-2019.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Lamb & Bell Pty Ltd and CEPU - Plumbing Division Victorian Branch Enterprise Agreement 2016-2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[3] The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 27 April 2018 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 4 May 2018. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 October 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE428162 PR606649>
- AGLC
- Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia [2018] FWCA 2384
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 2384
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission examined various aspects of the agreement to determine its compliance with the Act. Key considerations included whether the agreement provided for the appropriate minimum rates of pay and conditions, whether it included adequate provisions for employee representation and consultation, and whether it adhered to the procedural requirements for enterprise agreements. The Commission also assessed whether the agreement met the 'better off overall test', which requires that employees be no worse off financially under the terms of the agreement compared to their previous conditions. The Union argued that certain clauses in the agreement did not meet these statutory requirements and could potentially disadvantage employees.
In its decision, the Fair Work Commission found that while the agreement largely complied with the statutory requirements, it contained certain provisions that did not meet the criteria for approval. Specifically, the Commission identified issues with the provisions concerning procedural fairness and the 'better off overall test'. Despite these shortcomings, the Commission determined that the overall benefits of the agreement to the employees outweighed the deficiencies. Consequently, the Commission approved the enterprise agreement with some modifications to address the identified issues. The modifications included clarifying the procedural fairness provisions and ensuring that the 'better off overall test' was met by recalculating the financial implications for employees.
The final orders of the Commission included the approval of the enterprise agreement, subject to the modifications made to address the compliance issues. The agreement was to come into effect on the date of the decision, provided that the necessary steps were taken by the parties to implement the modifications. This decision underscores the importance of ensuring that enterprise agreements fully comply with the statutory requirements and highlights the Commission's role in overseeing the approval process.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.