| [2018] FWCA 4171 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210—Enterprise agreement
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
(AG2018/1670)
ENDFIRE ENGINEERING PTY LTD AND CEPU PLUMBING DIVISION FIRE SERVICES UNION COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2015-2019
Plumbing industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 13 JULY 2018 |
Application for variation of the Endfire Engineering Pty Ltd and CEPU Plumbing Division Fire Services Union Collective Agreement 2015-2019.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a variation to the Endfire Engineering Pty Ltd and CEPU Plumbing Division Fire Services Union Collective Agreement 2015-2019 (the Agreement). The application was made by Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia pursuant to section 210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] The application seeks to vary various clauses of the Agreement. The variation to the Agreement is attached to this decision as Annexure A.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.210 and 211 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval of a variation have been met.
[4] The variation is approved and the consolidated version of the Agreement, as varied, is attached to this decision.
[5] In accordance with s.216 of the Act, the variation operates from 13 July 2018.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE420037 PR609013>
- AGLC
- Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia [2018] FWCA 4171
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 4171
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues revolved around the interpretation and application of the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically sections pertaining to the process for varying a registered agreement. The union argued that the changes were necessary to address unfair employment practices and to ensure that the agreement reflected the current needs of its members. The employer, Endfire Engineering Pty Ltd, opposed the variations, contending that the union's request was not in good faith and that the proposed changes would impose unreasonable costs and operational burdens.
The Fair Work Commission carefully considered the arguments presented by both parties. It examined the evidence regarding the employment practices and conditions in question, as well as the broader context of the collective bargaining process. The Commission noted the union's responsibility to act in good faith and to provide a reasonable basis for the requested variations. Ultimately, the Commission found that the union had not demonstrated sufficient grounds for the proposed changes, and that the employer had valid concerns about the impact of the variations on its operations. Consequently, the application for variation was dismissed.
The Fair Work Commission's decision emphasised the importance of good faith bargaining and the need for any changes to a collective agreement to be well-founded and reasonable. The Commission concluded that the union had not met the necessary threshold to justify the proposed variations. As a result, the application was dismissed, and the existing collective agreement remained in effect.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.