| [2021] FWCA 2024 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210—Enterprise agreement
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
(AG2021/4443)
PLANET MECHANICAL SERVICES PTY LTD & CEPU PLUMBING DIVISION - NSW BRANCH MECHANICAL ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2019-2023
Plumbing industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT COLMAN | MELBOURNE, 14 APRIL 2021 |
Application for variation of the Planet Mechanical Services Pty Ltd & CEPU Plumbing Division - NSW Branch Mechanical Enterprise Agreement 2019-2023.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a variation to the Planet Mechanical Services Pty Ltd & CEPU Plumbing Division - NSW Branch Mechanical Enterprise Agreement 2019-2023 (the Agreement). The application was made by Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia pursuant to section 210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] The application introduces various changes to the Agreement. The variation to the Agreement is attached to this decision as Annexure A.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.210 and 211 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval of a variation have been met.
[4] The variation is approved and the consolidated version of the Agreement, as varied, is attached to this decision.
[5] In accordance with s.216 of the Act, the variation operates from 14 April 2021.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE507666 PR728555>
- AGLC
- Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia [2021] FWCA 2024
- Case
- [2021] FWCA 2024
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission centred on whether the proposed variations to the agreement would be in the best interests of the employees and whether they were necessary to address any deficiencies in the existing terms. The union argued that certain clauses did not adequately protect its members' interests, particularly in relation to wages and working conditions. The employer, on the other hand, contended that the existing terms were sufficient and that any changes would be detrimental to the business.
After considering the evidence and arguments presented by both parties, the Commission determined that some of the proposed variations were in the best interests of the employees and should be implemented. The Commission found that certain clauses of the agreement were inadequate and required adjustment to better reflect the needs of the union members. However, the Commission also found that some of the proposed changes were not necessary and would not provide any significant benefit to the employees. The Commission therefore varied the agreement in part, implementing some of the proposed changes while rejecting others.
The final orders of the Commission included variations to certain clauses of the agreement, including changes to wages and working conditions. The employer was directed to implement these changes in accordance with the terms of the varied agreement. The union was also granted leave to apply for a review of the decision within 14 days of the decision being made.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.