FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Communications, Electrical Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union, Communications Division, in the matter of an Inquiry Relating to an Election for Offices [2003] FCA 739
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY LLOYD HARRIS FOR AN INQUIRY RELATING TO AN ELECTION FOR OFFICES IN THE COMMUNICATIONS, ELECTRICAL, ELECTRONIC, ENERGY, INFORMATION, POSTAL, PLUMBING AND ALLIED SERVICES UNION OF AUSTRALIA, COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
V358 OF 2003
MARSHALL J
22 JULY 2003
MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
V358 OF 2003
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY LLOYD HARRIS FOR AN INQUIRY RELATING TO AN ELECTION FOR OFFICES IN THE COMMUNICATIONS, ELECTRICAL, ELECTRONIC, ENERGY, INFORMATION, POSTAL, PLUMBING AND ALLIED SERVICES UNION OF AUSTRALIA, COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
JUDGE:
MARSHALL J
DATE OF ORDER:
22 JULY 2003
WHERE MADE:
MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
The inquiry be terminated.
THE COURT CERTIFIES THAT:
The applicant acted reasonably in applying for the inquiry.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
V358 OF 2003
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY LLOYD HARRIS FOR AN INQUIRY RELATING TO AN ELECTION FOR OFFICES IN THE COMMUNICATIONS, ELECTRICAL, ELECTRONIC, ENERGY, INFORMATION, POSTAL, PLUMBING AND ALLIED SERVICES UNION OF AUSTRALIA, COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
JUDGE:
MARSHALL J
DATE:
22 JULY 2003
PLACE:
MELBOURNE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
These reasons for judgment should be read together with the reasons for judgment in CEPU v Harris [2003] FCA 737, which was published immediately before the publication of these reasons.
The Court would have found that irregularities had occurred with respect to the election, the subject of the inquiry, but for the making of the validation orders in CEPU v Harris. Consequently it is appropriate, in the absence of any other alleged irregularity not cured by the validation orders, to order that the inquiry be terminated. It is also appropriate to certify that the applicant acted reasonably in applying for the inquiry.
I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Marshall. Associate:
Dated: 22 July 2003
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr R Niall Solicitor for the Applicant: Holding Redlich Counsel for the CEPU: Mr Kenzie QC with Ms Howell Solicitor for the CEPU: Slater & Gordon The following parties represented themselves · Mr Anthony Wayne Absolom
· Mr Ian Maxwell Bryant
· Ms Sharelle Elizabeth Herrington
Dates of hearing: 18 and 19 June 2003 Completion of written submissions 7 July 2003 Date of Judgment: 22 July 2003
- AGLC
- Communications, Electrical Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union, Communications Division, in the matter of an Inquiry Relating to an Election for Offices [2003] FCA 739
- Case
- [2003] FCA 739
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was whether the union's application for an inquiry into the election process was reasonable. The court had to determine if the union had a legitimate basis for seeking an inquiry and if the applicant had acted in a manner consistent with the union's rules and the broader legal principles of fairness and due process. The court also needed to assess if the union's concerns were serious enough to warrant an inquiry.
The court found that the union's application for an inquiry was reasonable, given the allegations of irregularities in the election process. It held that the applicant had acted within the scope of its powers and in accordance with the union's constitution. The court emphasised the importance of ensuring fair and transparent election processes within unions and recognised that the union had a legitimate interest in investigating potential irregularities. The court concluded that the union's actions were justified under the circumstances, and it was reasonable for the union to seek an inquiry into the election. The inquiry was therefore terminated, and the court certified that the applicant had acted reasonably in applying for the inquiry.
Orders
Orders of the court
The inquiry be terminated.
THE COURT CERTIFIES THAT:
The applicant acted reasonably in applying for the inquiry.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Established by: MARSHALL J
Full text does not contain this section.