| [2024] FWCA 1005 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Commonwealth of Australia, as represented by the Inspector-General of Taxation
(AG2024/703)
INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF TAXATION ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024-2027
| Commonwealth employment | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT COLMAN | MELBOURNE, 21 MARCH 2024 |
Application for approval of the Inspector-General of Taxation Enterprise Agreement 2024-2027
The Commonwealth of Australia, as represented by the Inspector-General of Taxation, has applied under s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) for approval of an enterprise agreement, the Inspector-General of Taxation Enterprise Agreement 2024-2027 (the Agreement).
I am satisfied that the requirements of ss 186, 187 and 188 have been met. In particular, I am satisfied that the Agreement passes the ‘better off overall test’. The Agreement provides numerous terms of employment that are more beneficial to employees than those in the relevant award, including substantially higher salaries and employer superannuation contributions, and enhanced entitlements to leave. These terms comfortably outweigh the few terms which, in certain respects, are less beneficial than those in the award. In my view each award covered employee and each reasonably foreseeable employee will be better off overall under the Agreement.
The Community and Public Sector Union (CPSU) has given notice under s 183 that it wants the Agreement to cover it. As required by s 201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the CPSU.
The Agreement was approved on 21 March 2024 and will operate from 28 March 2024.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE523901 PR772569>
- AGLC
- Commonwealth of Australia, as represented by the Inspector-General of Taxation [2024] FWCA 1005
- Case
- [2024] FWCA 1005
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission involved the interpretation of the Fair Work Act, particularly sections concerning the approval of Enterprise Agreements, and the consideration of public interest factors that might affect the agreement's fairness. The Commission needed to ensure that the agreement did not undermine the efficiency or effectiveness of the public service and that it balanced the rights and interests of employees with the broader public interest.
In delivering its decision, the Commission examined the terms of the proposed agreement in detail. It considered the evidence presented on the impact of the agreement on the public service, the efficiency and effectiveness of the department, and the rights of employees. The Commission concluded that the proposed agreement was fair and reasonable, taking into account the public interest factors, and met the requirements of the Act. The Commission approved the Enterprise Agreement, allowing it to take effect as of the specified commencement date.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.