Commonwealth of Australia (As Represented By the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development) v Frost (No.2)

Case

[2017] FCCA 1380

23 June 2017


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Commonwealth of Australia (As Represented By the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development) v Frost (No.2) [2017] FCCA 1380 [2017] FCCA 1380 23 June 2017

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Commonwealth of Australia, represented by the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development, was the applicant in proceedings before Smith J of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia concerning a tenancy dispute. The respondent was Mr Frost.

The primary legal issue before the Court was the determination of costs following the resolution of the tenancy dispute. Specifically, the Court was required to decide whether the successful party should be awarded costs and, if so, how those costs should be calculated, with reference to Part 1 of Schedule 1 to the *Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001* (Cth).

Smith J determined that the successful party should be awarded costs. The Court proceeded to calculate these costs by applying the scale set out in Part 1 of Schedule 1 to the *Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001* (Cth). The Court noted that a stay of the costs order had been sought pending an appeal to the Federal Court of Australia.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Administrative Law

  • Civil Procedure

Legal Concepts

  • Costs

  • Appeal

  • Stay of Proceedings

  • Jurisdiction

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

3

Statutory Material Cited

4