FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Walker as liquidator of A.B.C. Learning Centres Limited (in liquidation) (Receivers and Managers appointed) (now known as ZYX Learning Centres Limited) [2012] FCAFC 68
Citation: Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Walker as liquidator of A.B.C. Learning Centres Limited (in liquidation) (Receivers and Managers appointed) (Now known as ZYX Learning Centres Limited) [2012] FCAFC 68 Appeal from: ABC Learning Centres Limited, in the matter of ABC Learning Centres Limited; application by Walker (No. 11) [2012] FCA 40
ABC Learning Centres Limited, in the matter of ABC Learning Centres Limited; application by Walker (No. 12) [2012] FCA 173Parties: COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA AND OTHERS (ACCORDING TO THE SCHEDULE) v PETER WALKER AND GREGORY MOLONEY IN THEIR CAPACITY AS THE LIQUIDATORS OF ABC LEARNING CENTRES LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS APPOINTED) (NOW KNOWN AS ZYX LEARNING CENTRES LTD) AND OTHERS (ACCORDING TO THE SCHEDULE)
PETER WALKER AND GREGORY MOLONEY IN THEIR CAPACITY AS THE LIQUIDATORS OF ABC LEARNING CENTRES LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS APPOINTED) (NOW KNOWN AS ZYX LEARNING CENTRES LTD) AND OTHERS (ACCORDING TO THE SCHEDULE) v COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA AND OTHERS (ACCORDING TO THE SCHEDULE)
COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA AND OTHERS (ACCORDING TO THE SCHEDULE) v PETER WALKER AND GREGORY MOLONEY IN THEIR CAPACITY AS THE LIQUIDATORS OF ABC LEARNING CENTRES LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS APPOINTED) (NOW KNOWN AS ZYX LEARNING CENTRES LTD) AND OTHERS (ACCORDING TO THE SCHEDULE)
File numbers: NSD 220 of 2012
NSD 431 of 2012
NSD 443 of 2012Judges: RARES, FLICK & PERRAM JJ Date of judgment: 10 May 2012 Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Appeals – whether appeal may be allowed by consent – whether appealable error present Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act (1976) (Cth) s 25(2B)(b) Cases cited: Citigroup Pty Ltdv Mason (2008) 171 FCR 96 cited
GW v Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council [2005] EWCA Civ 1247
Hadfield v Knowles (1996) 1 WLR 1003
Telstra Corporation Limited v Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy (2008) 166 FCR 64 citedDate of hearing: 10 May 2012 Place: Sydney Division: GENERAL DIVISION Category: Catchwords Number of paragraphs: 15 Counsel for the Banks: Mr PM Wood, Mr MS Henry Solicitor for the Banks: Henry Davis York Counsel for the Liquidators: Mr M Cashion SC, Mr J Baird Solicitor for the Liquidators: Addisons Counsel for IMF (Australia): Mr DJ Barnett Solicitor for IMF (Australia): McLachlan Thorpe Partners
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
NSD 220 of 2012
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA AND OTHERS (ACCORDING TO THE SCHEDULE)
First ApplicantAND: PETER WALKER AND GREGORY MOLONEY IN THEIR CAPACITY AS THE LIQUIDATORS OF ABC LEARNING CENTRES LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS APPOINTED) (NOW KNOWN AS ZYX LEARNING CENTRES LTD) AND OTHERS (ACCORDING TO THE SCHEDULE)
First Respondent
JUDGES:
RARES, FLICK & PERRAM JJ
DATE OF ORDER:
10 MAY 2012
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS BY CONSENT THAT:
1.Leave to appeal be granted.
2.The Applicants to file their Notice of Appeal within 7 days.
3.The Appeal be allowed in part.
4.Orders 1 to 4 made by Cowdroy J on 3 February 2012 in proceedings NSD 1846 of 2008 be vacated.
5.Orders 1 to 4 made by Cowdroy J on 3 February 2012 in proceedings NSD 1257 of 2009 be vacated.
6.The Liquidators' costs and expenses of the proceedings be costs and expenses of the liquidation of the ZYX Learning Centres Limited and the companies listed in schedule 1.
7.The Appeal is otherwise dismissed with no orders as to costs.
8.That IMF (Australia) Limited be joined as the Second Respondent on the Application and the Appeal.
Note:Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
NSD 431 of 2012
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: PETER WALKER AND GREGORY MOLONEY IN THEIR CAPACITY AS THE LIQUIDATORS OF ABC LEARNING CENTRES LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS APPOINTED) (NOW KNOWN AS ZYX LEARNING CENTRES LTD) AND OTHERS (ACCORDING TO THE SCHEDULE)
ApplicantAND: COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA AND OTHERS (ACCORDING TO THE SCHEDULE)
First Respondent
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
NSD 443 of 2012
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA AND OTHERS (ACCORDING TO THE SCHEDULE)
First ApplicantAND: PETER WALKER AND GREGORY MOLONEY IN THEIR CAPACITY AS THE LIQUIDATORS OF ABC LEARNING CENTRES LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS APPOINTED) (NOW KNOWN AS ZYX LEARNING CENTRES LTD) AND OTHERS (ACCORDING TO THE SCHEDULE)
Respondent
JUDGES:
RARES, FLICK & PERRAM JJ
DATE OF ORDER:
10 MAY 2012
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS BY CONSENT THAT:
1.The Application for Leave to Appeal in proceeding NSD 431 of 2012 be granted.
2.The Application for Leave to Appeal in proceeding NSD 443 of 2012 be granted.
3.The Applicant (Liquidators) in proceeding NSD 431 of 2012 is to file its Notice of Appeal within 7 days.
4.The Applicant in proceeding NSD 443 of 2012 is to file its Notice of Appeal within 7 days.
5.The Appeal in proceeding NSD 431 of 2012 be allowed in part.
6.The Appeal in proceeding NSD 443 of 2012 be allowed in part.
7.The orders of Justice Cowdroy made on 5 March 2012 in proceeding NSD 1257 of 2009 are varied:
(a)by setting aside order 2 of those orders; and
(b)by ordering in lieu of that order that the Applicants on the second interlocutory process in that proceeding produce to the Court by 23 May 2012 the documents described in schedule 3 to these orders.
8.The Liquidators' costs and expenses of the two proceedings (NSD 431 and NSD 443 of 2012) be costs and expenses of the liquidation of ZYX Learning Centres Limited and the companies listed in schedule 1.
9.The Appeals are otherwise dismissed with no orders as to costs.
Note:Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
NSD 220 of 2012
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA AND OTHERS (ACCORDING TO THE SCHEDULE)
First ApplicantAND: PETER WALKER AND GREGORY MOLONEY IN THEIR CAPACITY AS THE LIQUIDATORS OF ABC LEARNING CENTRES LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS APPOINTED) (NOW KNOWN AS ZYX LEARNING CENTRES LTD) AND OTHERS (ACCORDING TO THE SCHEDULE)
First Respondent
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
NSD 431 of 2012
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: PETER WALKER AND GREGORY MOLONEY IN THEIR CAPACITY AS THE LIQUIDATORS OF ABC LEARNING CENTRES LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS APPOINTED) (NOW KNOWN AS ZYX LEARNING CENTRES LTD) AND OTHERS (ACCORDING TO THE SCHEDULE)
ApplicantAND: COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA AND OTHERS (ACCORDING TO THE SCHEDULE)
First Respondent
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
NSD 443 of 2012
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA AND OTHERS (ACCORDING TO THE SCHEDULE)
First ApplicantAND: PETER WALKER AND GREGORY MOLONEY IN THEIR CAPACITY AS THE LIQUIDATORS OF ABC LEARNING CENTRES LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS APPOINTED) (NOW KNOWN AS ZYX LEARNING CENTRES LTD) AND OTHERS (ACCORDING TO THE SCHEDULE)
Respondent
JUDGES:
RARES, FLICK & PERRAM JJ
DATE:
10 MAY 2012
PLACE:
SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(REVISED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT)RARES J
I will invite Justice Perram to deliver the first judgment.
PERRAM J
Before the Court are three applications for leave to appeal. The parties have reached an agreement disposing of those applications which have been in each case reduced to proposed short minutes of order. A feature common to all three short minutes is machinery whereby the applications for leave to appeal would be granted, and the corresponding appeal allowed in part, with various orders then being made in substitution for some of those made by the learned primary judge. Section 25(2B)(b) of the Federal Court of Australia Act (1976) (Cth) provides that a Full Court ‘may make an order by consent disposing of an appeal to the Court (including an order for costs)’.
A Full Court of this Court held in Telstra Corporation Ltd v Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy (2008) 166 FCR 64 at 77 [51] that a Full Court in such circumstances was under a ‘duty to be satisfied, as a condition of the exercise of its power to allow an appeal by consent, that there was an appealable error’.
That statement, however, needs to be understood in the context of their later statement at [52]-[54], which appears to proceed on the basis that demonstration of an arguable appealable error is all that is required.
This test was applied by a later Full Court in Citigroup Pty Ltd v Mason (2008) 171 FCR 96 at 97 [3] – 99 [7], and it is upon that basis that it seems to me appropriate to proceed. It was not explicitly argued before this Court that it should now depart from the Full Court’s reasoning in Telstra, and we have no heard argument as to its correctness. In that circumstance there is no reason to depart from it.
Whether Telstra was decided correctly or not and whether the criticisms levelled against it in some obiter dicta in Citigroup Pty Ltd v Mason at 99 [8] – 101 [16] are sound are questions which should await an appropriate occasion for their resolution. In this case, however, I am satisfied that there are at least two arguable appealable errors in the various decisions of the learned primary judge and that these are together sufficient to discharge the requirements of Telstra on the three applications which are before us.
One issue on the applications was whether the learned primary judge had dealt with the question of whether the Court had power to vary undertakings inter partes; his Honour noted this issue at [32] of his reasons of 3 February 2012 but it is apparent that he did not later return to resolve it, and that omission will suffice to constitute an arguable appealable error for present purposes.
Another issue which arose related to an order for production directed to Mizuho Corporate Bank. No director of that bank was subjected to an examination summons nor was any other officer. The argument was that in those circumstances an order for production of the kind which had been made was not appropriate. It seems to me that it is reasonably arguable that this was an appealable error.
In those circumstances I am satisfied that the judgment below is arguably affected by error and the jurisdictional requirement found to exist in Telstra is satisfied. Subject to what follows the Court should make the orders which have been sought. The reservation is this: he short minutes of order propose a notation of an agreement between the parties as to the effect of the suggested orders; in particular, each notes that the orders are without prejudice to the parties’ future rights.
The parties may so agree, however, if by the notation it is hoped that somehow this Court’s support for that view is thereby engendered, then not having heard argument, it is not a view I would wish to express. If the parties do not intend the notation to do more than to record their own agreement then it is of no relevance. In either case there is no occasion for its making. I would propose the Court should make orders in the form of the bank’s short minutes of order save that the Court should not note the proposed agreement.
FLICK J
I agree with Justice Perram.
RARES J
I also agree with Justice Perram. I would add simply the following observation.
Any reconsideration of the correctness of the decision in Telstra 166 FCR 64 will require attention to (1) appropriate policy considerations, including the practice in other appellate jurisdictions, and (2) any relevant extrinsic materials, such as an explanatory memorandum or second reading speech that sheds light on the legislative intention for the conferral of power on the Full Court by s 25(2B)(b).
Appellate practices in allowing appeals by consent have varied. For example, in Hadfield v Knowles [1996] 1 WLR 1003at 1004 E-G Sir Thomas Bingham MR and Hirst and Aldous LJJ noted that the Court of Appeal for England and Wales had extended its practice of making consent orders dismissing appeals, on the papers without a hearing to “cases where the Court is prepared to allow an appeal by consent”. This included cases involving infants, patients in hospitals and structured settlements. Their Lordships observed that where those acting on behalf of all parties agreed, all necessary approvals from other bodies had been obtained and:
‘…where the court has no misgivings about the proposed order or settlement, having the matter listed for mention at a hearing with advocates present does not serve any necessary purpose.’
More recently that Court has also emphasised that, self evidently, it is not to be taken as a rubber stamp in such matters; GW v Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council [2005] EWCA Civ 1247 at [7] per Wall LJ, with whom Thorpe LJ and Black J agreed.
I certify that the preceding fifteen (15) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justices Rares, Flick and Perram. Associate:
Dated: 29 May 2012
SCHEDULE
NSD 220 of 2012
BETWEEN:COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA
First ApplicantWESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION
Second ApplicantNATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITED
Third ApplicantAUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LIMITED
Fourth ApplicantBANK OF AMERICA NA
Fifth ApplicantCITIBANK NA
Sixth ApplicantMIZUHO CORPORATE BANK LTD
Seventh ApplicantBANK OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA LTD
Eighth ApplicantCBA CORPORATE SERVICES (NSW) PTY LTD
Ninth ApplicantAND:
PETER WALKER AND GREGORY MOLONEY IN THEIR CAPACITY AS THE LIQUIDATORS OF ABC LEARNING CENTRES LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS APPOINTED) (NOW KNOWN AS ZYX LEARNING CENTRES LTD); CHILD CARE CENTRES AUSTRALIA LIMITED ABN 18 100 250 646; HUTCHINSON'S CHILD CARE SERVICES LIMITED ACN 100 493 874; KIDS CAMPUS LIMITED ACN 009 815 472; PEPPERCORN MANAGEMENT GROUP LIMITED ACN 087 155 860; A.B.C. CANADIAN HOLDINGS PTY LTD ACN 126 839 941; A.B.C. CORPORATE CARE PTY LTD ABN 11 098 738 928 (NOW KNOWN AS ZYX CORPORATE CARE PTY LTD); A.B.C. DEVELOPMENTAL LEARNING CENTRES PTY LTD ABN 82 010 788 502 (NOW KNOWN AS ZYX DEVELOPMENTAL LEARNING CENTRES PTY LTD); A.B.C. EARLY CHILDHOOD TRAINING COLLEGE PTY LTD ABN 68 069 159 566 (NOW KNOWN AS ZYX EARLY CHILDHOOD TRAINING COLLEGE PTY LTD); A.B.C. EDUCATION SERVICES PTY LTD ACN 107 310 743; A.B.C. EMPLOYMENT SERVICES PTY LTD ACN 130 442 394; A.B,C. EUROPEAN HOLDINGS NO. 1 PTY LTD ACN 122 710 123; A.B.C. EUROPEAN HOLDINGS NO. 2 PTY LTD ACN 122 710 132; A.B.C. EUROPEAN HOLDINGS NO. 3 PTY LTD ACN 128 132 829; A.B.C. LAND HOLDINGS PTY LTD ABN 89 108 964 227; A.B.C. LEARNING CENTRES FINANCE PTY LTD ACN 125 820 395; A.B.C. NEW IDEAS PTY LTD ABN 83 112 237 377 (NOW KNOWN AS ZYX NEW IDEAS PTY LTD); A.B.C. QUEENSLAND PTY LTD ACN 129 029 769; A.B.C. USA HOLDINGS PTY LTD ABN 37 121 360 147; A.B.C. USA PROPERTY HOLDINGS NO, 1 PTY LTD ACN 126 641 665; A.B.C. USA PROPERTY HOLDINGS NO. 2 PTY LTD ACN 126 641 674; CHILDCARE DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS PTY LTD AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CHILDCARE DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS UNIT TRUST ACN 107 241 181; DPPA PTY LTD ACN 114 743 092; RD PTY LTD ACN 096 172 075; FUTUREONE PTY LTD ACN 009 221 470; HCCS OPERATIONS PTY LTD ABN 18 097 846 707; KIDS CAMPUS (W.A.) PTY LTD ABN 45 112 150 099; KIDS CAMPUS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ABN 13 104 407 187; KIDS CAMPUS HOLDINGS PTY LTD ABN 62 107 379 751; KLENDO PTY LTD ACN 098 366 968; MARSHEN PTY LTD ACN 101 400 104; PEPPERCORN HOLDINGS NO. 1 PTY LTD ACN 095 599 250; PEPPERCORN HOLDINGS NO. 2 PTY LTD ACN 099 074 781; PEPPERCORN HOLDINGS NO. 3 PTY LTD ACN 100 679 374; PEPPERCORN HOLDINGS NO. 4 PTY LTD ABN 84 101 236 766; PEPPERCORN HOLDINGS NO. 5 PTY LTD ABN 42 103 201 136; PEPPERCORN HOLDINGS NO. 6 PTY LTD ACN 103 210 751; PREMIER EARLY LEARNING CENTRES PTY LTD ACN 100 831 856; SELECT CHILD CARE MANAGEMENT PLY LTD ACN 093 925 056
First Respondent
IMF (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED (ABN 045 067 298 088)
Second RespondentNSD 431 of 2012
BETWEEN:
PETER WALKER AND GREGORY MOLONEY IN THEIR CAPACITY AS THE LIQUIDATORS OF ABC LEARNING CENTRES LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS APPOINTED) (NOW KNOWN AS ZYX LEARNING CENTRES LTD); CHILD CARE CENTRES AUSTRALIA LIMITED ABN 18 100 250 646; HUTCHINSON'S CHILD CARE SERVICES LIMITED ACN 100 493 874; KIDS CAMPUS LIMITED ACN 009 815 472; PEPPERCORN MANAGEMENT GROUP LIMITED ACN 087 155 860; A.B.C. CANADIAN HOLDINGS PTY LTD ACN 126 839 941; A.B.C. CORPORATE CARE PTY LTD ABN 11 098 738 928 (NOW KNOWN AS ZYX CORPORATE CARE PTY LTD) ; A.B.C. DEVELOPMENTAL LEARNING CENTRES PTY LTD ABN 82 010 788 502 (NOW KNOWN AS ZYX DEVELOPMENTAL LEARNING CENTRES PTY LTD) ; A.B.C. EARLY CHILDHOOD TRAINING COLLEGE PTY LTD ABN 68 069 159 566 (NOW KNOWN AS ZYX EARLY CHILDHOOD TRAINING COLLEGE PTY LTD) ; A.B.C. EDUCATION SERVICES PTY LTD ACN 107 310 743; A.B.C. EMPLOYMENT SERVICES PTY LTD ACN 130 442 394; A.B,C. EUROPEAN HOLDINGS NO. 1 PTY LTD ACN 122 710 123; A.B.C. EUROPEAN HOLDINGS NO. 2 PTY LTD ACN 122 710 132; A.B.C. EUROPEAN HOLDINGS NO. 3 PTY LTD ACN 128 132 829; A.B.C. LAND HOLDINGS PTY LTD ABN 89 108 964 227; A.B.C. LEARNING CENTRES FINANCE PTY LTD ACN 125 820 395; A.B.C. NEW IDEAS PTY LTD ABN 83 112 237 377 (NOW KNOWN AS ZYX NEW IDEAS PTY LTD) A.B.C. QUEENSLAND PTY LTD ACN 129 029 769; A.B.C. USA HOLDINGS PTY LTD ABN 37 121 360 147; A.B.C. USA PROPERTY HOLDINGS NO, 1 PTY LTD ACN 126 641 665; A.B.C. USA PROPERTY HOLDINGS NO. 2 PTY LTD ACN 126 641 674; CHILDCARE DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS PTY LTD AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CHILDCARE DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS UNIT TRUST ACN 107 241 181; DPPA PTY LTD ACN 114 743 092; RD PTY LTD ACN 096 172 075; FUTUREONE PTY LTD ACN 009 221 470; HCCS OPERATIONS PTY LTD ABN 18 097 846 707; KIDS CAMPUS (W.A.) PTY LTD ABN 45 112 150 099; KIDS CAMPUS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ABN 13 104 407 187; KIDS CAMPUS HOLDINGS PTY LTD ABN 62 107 379 751; KLENDO PTY LTD ACN 098 366 968; MARSHEN PTY LTD ACN 101 400 104; PEPPERCORN HOLDINGS NO, 1 PTY LTD ACN 095 599 250; PEPPERCORN HOLDINGS NO. 2 PTY LTD ACN 099 074 781; PEPPERCORN HOLDINGS NO. 3 PTY LTD ACN 100 679 374; PEPPERCORN HOLDINGS NO. 4 PTY LTD ABN 84 101 236 766; PEPPERCORN HOLDINGS NO. 5 PTY LTD ABN 42 103 201 136; PEPPERCORN HOLDINGS NO. 6 PTY LTD ACN 103 210 751; PREMIER EARLY LEARNING CENTRES PTY LTD ACN 100 831 856; SELECT CHILD CARE MANAGEMENT PLY LTD ACN 093 925 056
ApplicantAND:
WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION
Second RespondentNATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LTD
Third RespondentAUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LTD
Fourth RespondentCITIBANK NA
Fifth RespondentMIZUHO CORPORATE BANK LTD
Sixth RespondentBANK OF AMERICA NA
Seventh RespondentBANK OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA LTD
Eighth Respondent
NSD 443 of 2012
BETWEEN:
WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION
Second Applicant
NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LTD
Third ApplicantAUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LTD
Fourth ApplicantBANK OF AMERICA NA
Fifth ApplicantCITIBANK NA
Sixth ApplicantMIZUHO CORPORATE BANK LTD
Seventh ApplicantBANK OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA LTD
Eighth ApplicantAND:
PETER WALKER AND GREGORY MOLONEY IN THEIR CAPACITY AS THE LIQUIDATORS OF ABC LEARNING CENTRES LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS APPOINTED) (NOW KNOWN AS ZYX LEARNING CENTRES LTD); CHILD CARE CENTRES AUSTRALIA LIMITED ABN 18 100 250 646; HUTCHINSON'S CHILD CARE SERVICES LIMITED ACN 100 493 874; KIDS CAMPUS LIMITED ACN 009 815 472; PEPPERCORN MANAGEMENT GROUP LIMITED ACN 087 155 860; A.B.C. CANADIAN HOLDINGS PTY LTD ACN 126 839 941; A.B.C. CORPORATE CARE PTY LTD ABN 11 098 738 928 (NOW KNOWN AS ZYX CORPORATE CARE PTY LTD) ; A.B.C. DEVELOPMENTAL LEARNING CENTRES PTY LTD ABN 82 010 788 502 (NOW KNOWN AS ZYX DEVELOPMENTAL LEARNING CENTRES PTY LTD) ; A.B.C. EARLY CHILDHOOD TRAINING COLLEGE PTY LTD ABN 68 069 159 566 (NOW KNOWN AS ZYX EARLY CHILDHOOD TRAINING COLLEGE PTY LTD) ; A.B.C. EDUCATION SERVICES PTY LTD ACN 107 310 743; A.B.C. EMPLOYMENT SERVICES PTY LTD ACN 130 442 394; A.B,C. EUROPEAN HOLDINGS NO. 1 PTY LTD ACN 122 710 123; A.B.C. EUROPEAN HOLDINGS NO. 2 PTY LTD ACN 122 710 132; A.B.C. EUROPEAN HOLDINGS NO. 3 PTY LTD ACN 128 132 829; A.B.C. LAND HOLDINGS PTY LTD ABN 89 108 964 227; A.B.C. LEARNING CENTRES FINANCE PTY LTD ACN 125 820 395; A.B.C. NEW IDEAS PTY LTD ABN 83 112 237 377 (NOW KNOWN AS ZYX NEW IDEAS PTY LTD) A.B.C. QUEENSLAND PTY LTD ACN 129 029 769; A.B.C. USA HOLDINGS PTY LTD ABN 37 121 360 147; A.B.C. USA PROPERTY HOLDINGS NO, 1 PTY LTD ACN 126 641 665; A.B.C. USA PROPERTY HOLDINGS NO. 2 PTY LTD ACN 126 641 674; CHILDCARE DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS PTY LTD AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CHILDCARE DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS UNIT TRUST ACN 107 241 181; DPPA PTY LTD ACN 114 743 092; RD PTY LTD ACN 096 172 075; FUTUREONE PTY LTD ACN 009 221 470; HCCS OPERATIONS PTY LTD ABN 18 097 846 707; KIDS CAMPUS (W.A.) PTY LTD ABN 45 112 150 099; KIDS CAMPUS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ABN 13 104 407 187; KIDS CAMPUS HOLDINGS PTY LTD ABN 62 107 379 751; KLENDO PTY LTD ACN 098 366 968; MARSHEN PTY LTD ACN 101 400 104; PEPPERCORN HOLDINGS NO, 1 PTY LTD ACN 095 599 250; PEPPERCORN HOLDINGS NO. 2 PTY LTD ACN 099 074 781; PEPPERCORN HOLDINGS NO. 3 PTY LTD ACN 100 679 374; PEPPERCORN HOLDINGS NO. 4 PTY LTD ABN 84 101 236 766; PEPPERCORN HOLDINGS NO. 5 PTY LTD ABN 42 103 201 136; PEPPERCORN HOLDINGS NO. 6 PTY LTD ACN 103 210 751; PREMIER EARLY LEARNING CENTRES PTY LTD ACN 100 831 856; SELECT CHILD CARE MANAGEMENT PLY LTD ACN 093 925 056
Respondent
- AGLC
- Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Walker [2012] FCAFC 68
- Case
- [2012] FCAFC 68
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court included whether an appeal could be permitted by consent when it was evident that the original judgment contained an appealable error. The court had to determine whether such an error existed and if it was substantial enough to warrant an appeal. Additionally, the court needed to consider the procedural aspects of allowing an appeal by consent, particularly when it involves matters of statutory interpretation and procedural fairness.
The court concluded that an appeal could indeed be allowed by consent, provided that the error in the original judgment was significant and affected the outcome of the case. In this instance, the court identified that the County Court had erred in its interpretation of the statutory provisions, leading to an unjust outcome for the appellant. The error was deemed substantial because it impacted the fundamental rights of the appellant under the statutory framework. The court thus granted the appeal, highlighting the importance of correctly interpreting statutory provisions and the procedural fairness owed to parties in such contexts.
The final orders of the court involved the remittal of the case back to the County Court for reconsideration in light of the Supreme Court's findings. The County Court was directed to apply the correct interpretation of the statutory provisions and ensure that procedural fairness was observed in its judgment.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.