Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Sandra Lee Tarrant
Case
•
[2011] NSWSC 1087
•20 September 2011
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Sandra Lee Tarrant [2011] NSWSC 1087
[2011] NSWSC 1087
20 September 2011
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case before the court involved the Commonwealth Bank of Australia as the plaintiff and Sandra Lee Tarrant as the defendant. The dispute centred on an application by the Commonwealth Bank to have the defendant's defence struck out and an application for summary judgment. The case was heard in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia. The bank sought to have the defendant's defence dismissed due to it being deemed unreasonable and an application to strike out was made on the basis that the defence was inappropriate for summary judgment proceedings. Additionally, the bank argued that the court should not consider an unconscionability defence under the Contracts Review Act 1980 on the summary judgment application.
The legal issues the court was required to decide included whether the defendant's defence was unreasonable and therefore should be struck out, and whether the court should consider an unconscionability defence under the Contracts Review Act 1980 in summary judgment proceedings. The court also had to determine if the plaintiff's application to strike out the defendant's defence was appropriate. Furthermore, the court needed to decide whether the defendant should be granted leave to amend her pleadings, which were deemed defective.
In its reasoning, the court held that the defendant's defence was unreasonable and struck it out. The court found that it was inappropriate to consider an unconscionability defence under the Contracts Review Act 1980 in the context of a summary judgment application. The court considered the defendant's pleadings to be defective, however, granted the defendant leave to amend her pleadings. The court concluded that the plaintiff was entitled to summary judgment on the basis that the defendant had no reasonable defence to the claim. The final orders included the striking out of the defendant's defence, the refusal to consider an unconscionability defence under the Contracts Review Act 1980 in summary judgment proceedings, and the granting of leave to the defendant to amend her pleadings.
The legal issues the court was required to decide included whether the defendant's defence was unreasonable and therefore should be struck out, and whether the court should consider an unconscionability defence under the Contracts Review Act 1980 in summary judgment proceedings. The court also had to determine if the plaintiff's application to strike out the defendant's defence was appropriate. Furthermore, the court needed to decide whether the defendant should be granted leave to amend her pleadings, which were deemed defective.
In its reasoning, the court held that the defendant's defence was unreasonable and struck it out. The court found that it was inappropriate to consider an unconscionability defence under the Contracts Review Act 1980 in the context of a summary judgment application. The court considered the defendant's pleadings to be defective, however, granted the defendant leave to amend her pleadings. The court concluded that the plaintiff was entitled to summary judgment on the basis that the defendant had no reasonable defence to the claim. The final orders included the striking out of the defendant's defence, the refusal to consider an unconscionability defence under the Contracts Review Act 1980 in summary judgment proceedings, and the granting of leave to the defendant to amend her pleadings.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Litigation & Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Summary Judgment
-
Standing
-
Defective Pleadings
-
Strike Out
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Commonwealth Bank of Australia Pty Ltd v Susan Amelia Quinn [2015] NSWSC 78
Cases Citing This Decision
6
Commonwealth Bank of Australia Pty Ltd v Susan Amelia Quinn
[2015] NSWSC 78
Commonwealth Bank of Australia Pty Ltd v Susan Amelia Quinn
[2015] NSWSC 78
The Trust Company (PTAL) Pty Ltd v Romeo (No 3)
[2013] NSWSC 347
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
3
Garcia v National Australia Bank Ltd
[1998] HCA 48
Garcia v National Australia Bank Ltd
[1998] HCA 48