Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Quade
Case
•
[1992] HCATrans 226
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Quade [1992] HCATrans 226
[1992] HCATrans 226
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commonwealth Bank of Australia appealed to the High Court of Australia against a decision concerning Thomas Quade, Mary Quade, Shawn Thomas Quade, and Gerard William Quade. The specific nature of the dispute and the decision under appeal are not detailed in the provided transcript.
The High Court was presented with an application for special leave to appeal. The central legal issue was whether special leave to appeal should be granted.
The parties, through their solicitors, had executed a consent to an order. This consent indicated an agreement that the appeal should be dismissed and that the applicant, the Commonwealth Bank of Australia, should bear the respondents' costs associated with the application for special leave.
Accordingly, the High Court made a consent order dismissing the appeal and ordering the Commonwealth Bank of Australia to pay the respondents' costs of the application for special leave.
The High Court was presented with an application for special leave to appeal. The central legal issue was whether special leave to appeal should be granted.
The parties, through their solicitors, had executed a consent to an order. This consent indicated an agreement that the appeal should be dismissed and that the applicant, the Commonwealth Bank of Australia, should bear the respondents' costs associated with the application for special leave.
Accordingly, the High Court made a consent order dismissing the appeal and ordering the Commonwealth Bank of Australia to pay the respondents' costs of the application for special leave.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Consent
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Papandony v Citibank [2002] NSWSC 678
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0