Commissioner of Taxation v Thiel, G

[1987] FCA 39

O n AnpL?al F r o n t h e Sur;reme CourL o f I : o s t e r n A u s t r a l i a

JUDCI: i1.4KING ORDER: FRENCA J.

DATE OF' ORDER: 3 FEERUARY 1 9 5 7

\ W E R E MADE : PERT?]

1. No o r d e r o n a p p l i c a t i o n for leave t o a p p e a l .

2. ?To order a s t o cos t s .

Mote: S e t t l e m e n t a n d e n t r y of o rders is d e a l t

w i t h i n O r d e r 3 6 of t h e Fedcral C o u r t Rulnr,

( see also O r d e r 3 7 rule 2 ( 3 ) . )

I	,
c

1 .

G u n t c r T h i c l , u n d e r P a r t V oL t h o Income T a x /A,ss??snent Act 1 9 3 6 .

I t is contendcc! t h a t thc Cor1:~issicner '~; , : : lcctlcn ( lerj-Ic=

Lrom h i s ag rcemcn t t o come t o c o u r t o d a y tc; a r g u e t h e IC;IVP

az lp l ica t ion . He has agreed to come tc c o u r t Lmt t h a t tlocs not

c o n s t i t u t e a n e l e c t i o n t o a p p l y t o a s l n q l e 1uclc~c f o r l e a v e t o

a p p c a l . Indeed , t he app l i ca t ion fo r l eave t o a,nm=al s p c c l F i c a l l y

seeks i n paragraph 5 t h e following order : -

" T h e a p p l i c a n t f u r t h e r a p p l i e s , p u r s u a r j t t o o rde r 5 2

r u l e 37 oE t h e R u l c s oE t h e F c c l c r a l C o u r t , t h a t h e

a p p l i c a t i o n f o r l e a v e to agpeal Sc heard concur ren t ly

with or imnodia te ly before the hoor ing O F t he a n : > e a l . "

3 .

Assoc ia te :